While many Iranians are languishing under a mismanaged and floundering economy, the Iranian regime has attempted to shift the blame for its citizens’ distress to sanctions implemented by the international community to further demonize the West in the eyes of its population. The reality, however, is that economy has long been plagued by the regime’s endemic corruption, economic mismanagement, and reckless foreign policy.
Iran ranks 131 out of 176 countries listed on Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index for 2016.
Corruption and mismanagement in Iran significantly worsened during the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, despite the fact that he came to power on a populist, anti-corruption platform. In Ahmadinejad’s first year as president in 2005, for example, Transparency International ranked Iran at 88th among 159 countries in its annual corruption index. In 2012, the situation worsened considerably, with Transparency International ranking Iran as one of the most corrupt countries worldwide, with a ranking of 133 among 176 nations.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his administration presided over unprecedented corruption scandals. In 2009, a state audit found that the Iranian Oil Ministry failed to deposit $1.05 billion into state accounts related to surplus oil revenues. In 2011, the biggest financial scandal in Iran’s history was uncovered in which $2.6 billion was embezzled from the country’s leading banks.
Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani was the leading critic of Ahmadinejad and his administration’s policies. In one swipe at Ahmadinejad, Larijani blamed government mismanagement for 80% of Iran’s economic troubles, particularly “the maladroit application of the plan to suppress subsidies.” In fact, Ahmadinejad’s loose monetary policy, subsidy cuts and populist cash-handouts helped precipitate the ongoing currency crisis and inflationary spiral. In response to these broadsides, Ahmadinejad accused Larijani and his family of financial corruption, a charge that he continues to make in the current political climate. Nonetheless, even Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei acknowledged that while the sanctions may cause problems, “mismanagement may even increase these problems.”
Manufacturing a Healthcare Crisis in the Ahmadinejad Presidency
Iran also faced a healthcare crisis due to government mismanagement and corruption. In November 2012, Hosseinali Shahriari, the head of parliament’s health committee, said that “the government is playing with our people’s health and is not assigning the approved finances.” Iran’s then Minister of Health, Marzieh Vahid Dastjerdi, reported that of the $2.5 billion earmarked in Iran’s annual budget to import medicine and medical supplies, only $600 million had been delivered by Iran’s central bank this year. She further protested, “I have heard that luxury cars have been imported with subsidized dollars but I don't know what happened to the dollars that were supposed to be allocated for importing medicine.” This dissent was too much for the Iranian regime to tolerate, since it contradicted the regime narrative that U.S. and EU were to blame. As a result, Ahmadinejad fired Dastjerdi in late December 2012. She was the only female minister in the government’s cabinet.
Criticism came from the business community as well. According to Reuters, “A source inside a government pharmacy in Tehran said that low stocks of vital drugs were being exacerbated by ‘strategic stockpiling’. Of 20 units of medication, two were available to the public and the rest ‘reserved’ for those who have influence or good connections.”
To counter these charges, the Iranian regime and its state media apparatus fabricated stories blaming the sanctions for civilian deaths. In the most prominent case of such manipulation, Iranian officials declared the death of 15-year-old hemophiliac Manouchehr Esmaili-Liousi as the first civilian death directly linked to the sanctions. According to the government’s account, the teenager died due to a shortage of drugs to treat his condition. In reality, Manouchehr fell and cut himself while hiking in the mountains. By the time he had reached the hospital two hours later, he had lost too much blood to be saved. The Times of London instructed that “the campaign over Manouchehr's death underscored the eagerness in Tehran to blame sanctions for the crisis, shifting attention away from the toxic combination of mismanagement and corruption in the government.”
Where medical shortages did exist, the IRGC exacerbated the problem and profited from it. Instead of properly applying the government subsidized exchanged rate to imports of food and medicine, the IRGC exploited it to purchase luxury goods. The Times of London reported that “regime officials continue to enjoy world-class healthcare while choking off medical funding to ordinary citizens. Surplus drugs from Revolutionary Guard hospitals are dumped on the black market, where they are sold to health groups and civilians at three times the price.”
The Iranian government had the power to end this crisis, but instead made it worse to weaken the resolve of the international community to robustly implement sanctions. Through its oil exports, Iran had billions of dollars in local-currency accounts in Turkey and Asian countries, which could be used to buy medical supplies of local or Western-manufacture for the Iranian people. Instead, the regime exploited the welfare of its citizens in order to protect its illicit nuclear program.
In the words of a U.S. Treasury Department spokesman at the time, “It has been the longstanding policy of the United States not to target Iranian imports of humanitarian items, such as food, medicine and medical devices. If there is in fact a shortage of some medicines in Iran, it is due to choices made by the Iranian government, not the US government.” Instead of allocating hard currency to needed medical supplies, it “is being allocated by the government to other purposes, whether it is supporting the Assad regime [in Syria], supporting terrorism or supporting the nuclear program.”
Ahmadinejad’s scandals continued to plague him even after he left office. His first vice president, Mohammad Reza Rahimi, was sentenced to five years in prison for “acquiring wealth through illicit methods” in 2015. Sentencing of his vice president for executive affairs, Mohammad Baghaei, soon followed in December 2017, when Baghaei announced he had been sentenced to 63 years in prison for financial malfeasance. That’s not to mention Ahmadinejad being convicted on seven counts, including misuse of state funds totaling two billion dollars, by the Supreme Audit Court.
Corruption and Mismanagement in the Rouhani Administration
Hassan Rouhani took office in 2013 warning that corruption was “endangering” the Islamic Revolution and that money once “given under the table now is being given on the table.” He also sounded the alarm on the perils of monopolies in Iran—a subtle rebuke to the power and primacy of the IRGC in the economy.
Analysts have given Rouhani mixed marks on his anti-corruption campaign. Scholars such asBijan Khajehpour, have highlighted the the establishment of “provincial offices to fight administrative corruption on bureaucratic levels” as well as the issuing of an anti-smuggling decree in 2014. At the same time, according to the Financial Times, the Rouhani administration announced its intention to close credit institutions affiliated with the IRGC, increase oversight on the banking system, crack down on expropriation of land by elites and make powerful foundations which received tax exemptions in the past pay their fair share—particularly Astan-e Qods, which is headed by Ebrahim Raisi, Rouhani’s opponent in the 2017 presidential election.
But Rouhani and his allies ran into a wall of opposition. For instance, militant cleric Ayatollah Ahmad Khatami quipped that “corruption will not be eradicated by just holding conferences.” The head of the Basij volunteer forces at the time also retorted “[u]nlike what some politicians say, the Basij and the Revolutionary Guard need to be present on all grounds including the “defensive economy.” It is only this way corruption can be eradicated.”
Rouhani has persisted in making corruption a central issues in his second term. In November 2017 after earthquakes destroyed housing units in Sarpol-e Zahab, Rouhani complained “[i]t’s clear there has been corruption in construction contracts.”
Yet Rouhani’s government has also stood accused of self-dealing. In 2016, the New York Times reported on bombshell allegations in Iranian media concerning inflated bonuses and salaries for executives of state-controlled companies on Rouhani’s watch. These figures were much higher than the legal limit of $2,353 per month for government employees. Other allegations included $50,000 bonuses for executives at the government-controlled Central Insurance Company and the head of the state-owned Tejarat Bank, named to his post under Rouhani, receiving $208,115 over 21 months and a zero-interest loan of $289,000.
In addition Rouhani’s inner-circle also stood accused of corruption. Sadegh Larijani, the head of Iran’s judiciary, accused Rouhani publicly of receiving embezzled state funds from Babak Zanjani, the point main in assisting the Islamic Republic with evading the pre-nuclear deal sanctions. Rouhani’s first vice president Eshaq Jahangiri as well as his own brother Hossein Fereydoun were also targeted with nepotism and cronyism charges.
As the protests of December 2017 and January 2018 over the state of the economy continue, Iran’s corruption ranking history during his tenure speaks volumes: according to World Bank data, the Islamic Republic’s ease of doing business ranking slid to 124 in 2017 from 120 in 2016 out of 190 economies from across the world.
The IRGC: A Corrupt Conglomerate
The IRGC, empowered under Ahmadinejad, is at the forefront of corruption in Iran today. Designed to safeguard the Islamic Revolution and maintain an ideologically austere ethos, the IRGC has become increasingly corrupt and materialistic.
The IRGC now owns billions in assets and controls hundreds of shell corporations. The organization is commonly awarded no-bid contracts without independent oversight in Iran’s lucrative energy sector and across the economy. The IRGC claims that its profits then go into the national treasury, but there are no public records to verify this.
Wealth also came historically from the IRGC’s immense smuggling operations. The IRGC leveraged its economic and political influence to corner Iran’s $12 billion smuggling industry by illegally importing vast quantities of goods through IRGC-controlled jetties and airport terminals that operate outside the jurisdiction of Iranian customs authorities.
As a result of the IRGC’s financial penetration, it is estimated that IRGC control of the economy “range[s] from a third to nearly two-thirds of Iran's GDP – amounting to tens of billions of dollars.” The IRGC is estimated to own at least half of Iran’s government-owned companies and control 68 percent of Iran’s total exports. With this newfound wealth, the IRGC has been importing expensive luxury cars.
President Rouhani’s proposed $337 billion budget for the year beginning in March 21, despite promising to clip the IRGC’s wings, relegates the regular army to second-tier status in the monetary hierarchy—reports indicate that the IRGC is slated to receive three times the amount of money as the army, at the same time that subsidies are being cut and fuel prices are expected to rise.
Setad Ejraiye Farmane Hazrate Emam (SETAD)
SETAD was founded by Ayatollah Khomeini in the latter part of his reign to manage abandoned properties in the aftermath of the Islamic Revolution of 1979. According to the Treasury Department, SETAD, “through two main subsidiaries, oversees a labyrinth of 37 ostensibly private businesses, many of which are front companies. The purpose of the network is to generate and control massive, off-the-books investments, shielded from the view of the Iranian people and international regulators." According to a 2013 investigation by Reuters, SETAD is directly controlled by the supreme leader, has assets totaling $95 billion, and is has no external supervisory structure. Per Reuters, “[t]he revenue stream generated by Setad helps explain why Khamenei has not only held on for 24 years… Setad gives him the financial means to operate independently of parliament and the national budget, insulating him from Iran's messy factional infighting.”
In addition to SETAD’s lack of accountability, it has engaged in self-dealing. For example, in 2016, the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), which the U.S. Treasury Department has dubbed an agent or affiliate of the IRGC, signed its first oil output contract with Persia Oil & Gas Industry Development Company, an Iranian firm that is a subsidiary of SETAD.
It’s within this context that Iran’s protests envelop the country—a country plagued by opacity, unaccountability, and corruption and mismanagement scandals across successive governments.