Withdrawn

UBS

Industry
Banking
Value of USG Contracts
7
Value of USG Contract Source
http://usaspending.gov/explore?fromfiscal=yes&fiscal_year=2000&contractorid=259915&fiscal_year=&tab=By+Prime+Awardee&fromfiscal=yes&carryfilters=on&Submit=Go
Symbol
NYSE:UBS
States
CT
IL
NJ
NY
Country
Switzerland
Sources

According to its Iran Notice filed with the SEC for fiscal year 2019: UBS has a Group Sanctions Policy that prohibits transactions involving sanctioned countries, including Iran, and sanctioned individuals and entities. However, UBS maintains one account involving the Iranian government under the auspices of the United Nations in Geneva after agreeing with the Swiss government that it would do so only under certain conditions. These conditions include that payments involving the account must: (1) be made within Switzerland; (2) be consistent with paying rent, salaries, telephone and other expenses necessary for its operations in Geneva; and (3) not involve any Specially designated Nationals blocked or otherwise restricted under U.S. or Swiss law. In 2017, the gross revenues for this UN related account were approximately USD 15,580. UBS AG does not allocate expenses to specific client accounts in a way that tables it to calculate net profits with respect to any individual account. UBS AG intends to continue maintaining this account pursuant to the conditions it has established and consistent with the conditions it has established with the Swiss Government and its Group Sanctions Policy. UBS also maintains a rental surety (effectively a rental security deposit) account in relation to the Government of Iran’s UN Mission premises in Geneva; there were no revenues associated with this account."

--

UBS has a Group Sanctions Policy that prohibits transactions involving sanctioned countries, including Iran, and sanctioned individuals and entities. However, UBS maintains one account involving the Iranian government under the auspices of the United Nations in Geneva after agreeing with the Swiss government that it would do so only under certain conditions. These conditions include that payments involving the account must: (1) be made within Switzerland; (2) be consistent with paying rent, salaries, telephone and other expenses necessary for its operations in Geneva; and (3) not involve any Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs) blocked or otherwise restricted under U.S. or Swiss law. In 2017, the gross revenues for this UN-related account were approximately USD 15,580.  We do not allocate expenses to specific client accounts in a way that enables us to calculate net profits with respect to any individual account.  UBS AG intends to continue maintaining this account pursuant to the conditions it has established with the Swiss Government and consistent with its Group Sanctions Policy. UBS also maintains a rental surety (effectively a rental security deposit) account in relation to the Government of Iran's UN Mission premises in Geneva; there were no revenues for this account.

--

"When it comes to U.S. sanctions on Iran, no detail is too small to overlook these days. Since February, publicly traded companies have filed nearly 500 disclosure forms about their business ties to Iran…On Nov. 8, banking giant UBS said it had arranged trade financing for Swiss exporters involving four Iranian banks allegedly taking part in deals related to weapons of mass destruction. The bank said in its public filing that there had been no transactions since February 2012 but that it still maintained 'one existing account relationship' with one of the Iranian banks." (Washington Post, "Under new law, companies disclosing even tiniest dealings with Iran," 12/4/13)

--

"In 2004 UBS, a Swiss bank, paid a $100m fine (without admitting any liability) for providing new banknotes to Cuba and Iran." (The Economist. "Patchy blockade; Cuba and the United States," 8/16/08)

--

"US victims of attacks in Israel and their families are suing Swiss bank UBS for 500 million dollars, alleging it financed terrorism by doing business with Iran, their lawyer told AFP Tuesday." (AFP. "US families sue UBS over alleged terror links," 5/13/08)

 --

"In late 2005, Dutch bank ABN Amro agreed to pay $80 million in fines stemming in part from improper transactions with Iran through its subsidiary in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. UBS Bank and Credit Suisse of Switzerland recently announced they were suspending most new business with Iran, and British-based HSBC said it would no longer accept dollar transactions from within Iran." (Los Angeles Times, "U.S. Puts The Squeeze On Iran's Oil Fields," January 7, 2007) "Since January three European banks - UBS, Credit Suisse and ABN Amro - have curtailed their activities in Iran. The banks said that their decisions to cut back had been business ones." (The London Times, "American pressure threatens UK firms," May 27, 2006)

--


UBS will no longer deal with individuals, companies or state institutions such as Iran's central bank, said company spokesman Serge Steiner. A similar policy is also being implemented in the case of Syria, he said.

All existing business with customers in Iran will be canceled, but Iranians in exile are not affected by the decision, Steiner said, confirming an article in Swiss weekly SonntagsZeitung.

"It is a carefully prepared measure that has been under consideration since last fall," Steiner said.

Iran, under increasing international pressure over its nuclear program — and mindful of the freezing of its U.S. assets after the 1979 seizure of the American Embassy in Tehran — has already begun transferring its reserves from European banks to an undisclosed location.

Steiner declined to specify the volume of business affected by the bank's decision. (Fox News. "UBS Halts Business with Iran," 1/22/06)

Response

No response at this time.

Total SA

Industry
Energy
Value of USG Contracts
1474
Value of USG Contract Source
http://usaspending.gov/explore?fromfiscal=yes&fiscal_year=2010&contractorid=246429&fiscal_year=&tab=By+Prime+Awardee&fromfiscal=yes&carryfilters=on&Submit=Go
Symbol
NYSE:TOT
States
NJ
TX
Country
France
Sources

According to Total's 20-F filing with the SEC submitted in March 2022, "operational activities related to Iran were stopped in 2018 following the withdrawal of the U.S. from the JCPOA." However, the form also notes that the company "maintains a local representative office in Tehran with four employees solely for non-operational functions."

--

As of September 21, 2021, Total remained on Florida SBA List of Continued Examination Companies with Petroleum Energy Activities in Iran. 

--

As of July 1, 2021, Total is no longer identified by US state of Mississippi as a company engaged in investment activities in Iran's energy sector valued at $20,000,000 or more. 

--

"French energy group Total is not considering returning to Iran for now due to uncertainty regarding sanctions on the country, Chief Financial Officer Jean-Pierre Sbraire told an analysts’ conference call on Thursday. Earlier this week, world powers and Iran sought to speed up efforts to bring Washington and Tehran back into compliance with the 2015 nuclear accord, as the United States reassured its Gulf Arab allies on the status of the talks." (Reuters, "French Energy Group Total Not Considering Returning To Iran For Now," 4/29/2021). 

--

As of March 9, 2021, Total remained on the Florida SBA List of Continued Examination Companies with Petroleum Energy Activities in Iran. 

--

As of July 2020, Total remains on the Pennsylvania Treasury's List of Scrutinized Companies Determined as Having Involvement In Iran because of oil-related investment of US $20 million since 1996. 

--

In 2020, the U.S. state of Mississippi listed Total on its state lists of Companies Doing Business with the Iranian Petroleum/Natural Gas, Nuclear and Military Sectors, rendering it ineligible for investment and/or state contracting.

--

"The company has been identified as proceeding with energy-related business opportunities in Iran. In a letter dated January 3, 2018 the company stated it continually monitors its activities to ensure full compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including international economic sanctions. In a press release dated May 16, 2018, following announcement of the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPoA and planned re-imposition of sanctions, the company stated it is withdrawing from business activities in Iran. Total S.A. announced that it has become Total SE following its registration with the Trade and Companies Register of Nanterre as a European Company, which occurred on July 16, 2020. CalPERS moved the company into “monitor” status in 2018. CalPERS has maintained the company in “monitor” status for 2020. CalPERS continues to monitor the company for possible changes in status relevant to the Act."

--

As of October 2019, Total remains on the Pennsylvania Treasury's List of Scrutinized Companies Determined as Having Involvement In Iran because of oil-related investment of US $20 million since 1996. 

--

"Tehran had hoped the Chinese state-run company would replace France’s Total SA, which left the project last year after the U.S. reinstated sanctions on Iran." (Wall Street Journal, "China Pulls Out of Giant Iranian Gas Project," 10/6/2019).
 

--

As of August 1, 2019, Total Gabon S.A., Total Mory Maroc SA, Total Petrochemicals & Refining SA and Total Petroleum Ghana Ltd, were removed from the Ohio list of Iran Sudan scrutinized companies.

--

Total is listed on the June 2019 Alaska Retirement Management Board, Companies Doing Material Business with Iran list.

--

Total is listed on the March 2019 Alaska Retirement Management Board, Companies Doing Material Business with Iran list and the Rhode Island scrutinized companies list: Iran. 

--

As of June 30, 2018 Iowa Board of Regents listed Total on its Iran divestment Scrutinized companies list. 

--

Total SA had previously been removed from the Iran-related securities list after ceasing operations in Iran. In 2016, CalSTRS designated Total SA as “Being Monitored” and maintained that designation in 2017. In 2018, CalSTRS removed Total SA after the company decided not to proceed with projects in Iran, citing U.S. sanction issues.

--

"As a consequence and as already explained before, Total will not be in a position to continue the SP11 project and will have to unwind all related operations before 4 November 2018 unless Total is granted a specific project waiver by the US authorities with the support of the French and European authorities. This project waiver should include protection of the Company from any secondary sanction as per US legislation." (5/16/2018).

--

"Total SA said it will not risk investing in Iran following the return of U.S. sanctions, unless it can secure a waiver. Continuing to do business in Iran would be too great a risk as the company has large operations in the U.S. and depends on the country’s banks for financing its operations, Total said in a statement Wednesday. So the French energy giant won’t commit any more funds to Iran’s South Pars 11 project, in which it took a controlling stake last year." (May 16, 2018).

--

European oil companies could be particularly hit - French company Total signed a $5bn deal with Iran after the agreement, while BP has a joint venture to operate the Rhum gas field with Iran's state oil company. (May 11, 2018)

--

In 2017 the U.S. state of Alaska, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee listed Total on its list of companies doing material business with Iran rendering Total ineligible for investment and/or state contracting.

--

In 2017 the U.S. State of California identified Total as a company under review for proceeding with energy-related business opportunities in Iran.

--

In 2017 the U.S. state of Florida listed Total on its continued examination list of companies with petroleum energy activities in Iran.

--

In 2018 the U.S. state of Iowa, Ohio listed Total as an Iran restricted company rendering Total ineligible for investment and/or state contracting. 

--

"In recent weeks, Total, the French energy giant, has been sending small amounts of euros from banks in Europe to Tehran. It was the corporate equivalent of setting up a direct deposit. Total wanted to test the banking system and learn how difficult it was to make day-to-day transactions in Iran. As it considers investing in Iran, the company is moving cautiously. It has assigned a full-time compliance officer to the country to ensure it doesn't run afoul of any rules: It can't allow any Americans to work on its projects there, and has to be careful to avoid sanctioned Iranians. Like many international oil players, Total has been lured by the promise of a large and lucrative market with vast energy reserves. But the changing geopolitical landscape has made companies wary of the sanctions and restrictionsas tied to working there." (New York Times, "Even Bold Foreign Investors Tiptoe In Iran," 3/31/2017).

--

"Total is seeking a 50 percent stake in a $4 billion project in Iran's giant South Pars gas field, the French energy firm said in a regulatory filing on Friday detailing talks held with Iranian officials on several projects in 2016. Total signed a preliminary deal for the South Pars project last year, becoming the first Western oil major to sign an energy agreement after the European Union and the United States eased sanctions as part of a pact to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions. In a filing to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Total said the South Pars 11 project would require investment of about $4 billion, with the French firm financing 50.1 percent with equity contributions and payments in non-U.S. currency. If finalised, Total would operate the project with a 50.1 percent stake, China's CNPC would own 30 percent through one of its subsidiaries and Iran's Petropars would have 19.9 percent." (Reuters, "France's Total Seeks Stake In $4 Billion Iranian Gas Field Project," 3/17/2017).

--

In 2017, Total was re-added to the Pennsylvania Treasury's List of Scrutinized Companies Determined as Having Involvement in Iran after new involvement in Iran was identified. 

--

"Iran's oil minister has criticised French oil company Total for its decision to delay signing a contract to develop a gas field in southern Iran, saying that the reasons given by Total's chief executive were "unacceptable" to Tehran. Total was the first Western energy company to sign a major deal with Tehran since the lifting of international sanctions with its South Pars 11 project in the Gulf to develop a part of the world's largest gas field that Iran shares with Qatar. Total's chief executive, Patrick Pouyanne, said last week that it aimed to make a final investment decision on the $2 billion project by the summer, but the decision hinges on the renewal of U.S. sanctions waivers. "I don't know why Total has said so," Bijan Zanganeh was quoted as saying by Mehr news agency on Wednesday. "It's been included in the contract that we all follow European Union's policies. Their comments are unacceptable," he added. U.S. President Donald Trump has called into doubt the Western powers' deal with Iran over its nuclear technology development programme and, responding to an Iran's ballistic missile test last month, imposed fresh sanctions on Tehran. The South Pars 11 project aims to produce 1.8 billion cubic feet a day of gas, equivalent to 370,000 barrels of oil. The produced gas will be fed into Iran's gas network." (Reuters, "Iran Berates Total for Delaying Gas Field Development Deal," 2/15/2017).

--

"French oil major Total plans to make a final investment decision on a $2 billion gas project in Iran by the summer, but the decision hinges on the renewal of U.S. sanctions waivers, the company's chief executive said on Thursday. Total was the first Western energy company to sign a major deal with Tehran since the lifting of international sanctions against Iran. Its project aims to develop South Pars 11, which is part of the world's largest gas field. Chief Executive Patrick Pouyanne said South Pars 11 will be among a couple of projects to be approved by the company to start by the summer, if nothing is modified with regards to the sanctions." (Reuters, "Major Total Says Final Investment decision on Iran Project Depends on Renewal of U.S. Waivers," 2/9/2017).

--

In 2016 and 2017 Tennessee used the South Carolina list of "Entities Ineligible to Contract with the State of South Carolina or any Political Subdivision of the State per the Iran Divestment Act of 2014, S.C. Code Ann." as its list of persons it determines engage in investment activities in Iran. Total was included on this list in 2016 and 2017. "Inclusion on this list would make a person ineligible to contract with the state of Tennessee, if a person ceases its engagement in investment activities in Iran, it may be removed from the list."

--

Iran’s oil minister said Total will equip Phase 11 of the country’s South Pars gas field with a pressure booster station to regularly pomp 2 billion cubic feet of gas per day for nearly 20 years as part of a deal between Tehran and the French energy giant. Speaking to Tasnim on Monday, Bijan Namdar Zanganeh said, “Total will accept the responsibility to install a pressure booster station in Phase 11 to fix its output at 2 billion cubic feet per day for 15 to 20 years”. Earlier, Iran and Total signed an agreement over the development of South Pars Phase 11. The deal involves a consortium led by Total, which also includes the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) and Iran's Petropars. (Tasnim News Energy,  "Total to Install Pressure Booster Station at South Pars Phase 11: Iran's Oil Minister," 12/19/2016).

--

"Total SA of France on Wednesday is also negotiating an investment in its second big Iranian energy development, the spokeswoman told The Wall Street Journal. The oil ministry initially said Total would be part of Wednesday’s announcement." (The Wall Street Journal, "Shell Expected to Sign Iran Oil Deal Despite Uncertainty Over Trump," 12/7/2016).

--

In the middle of the U.S. presidential election Tuesday, Iran announced a $4.8 billion deal with French oil company Total SA — the first of its kind since the international community lifted economic sanctions on Iran in January as part of the nuclear deal. But the election victory by Donald Trump — who lambasted the Iran accord on the campaign trail and hinted he’d like to reimpose sanctions — may dissuade other energy companies from following Total’s path... Trump’s election threatens to nip Iran’s energy revival in the bud, and make it even harder for U.S. firms to elbow their way into a market desperate for Western capital and technology. “With the election of Trump, it’s even less likely,” Matthew Reed, vice president at consultancy Foreign Reports, told Foreign Policy... A Trump administration could well reinstate some or all of the economic sanctions that would limit Western firms’ ability to do business there, Reed warned. The Total deal is “the icebreaker ,but caution still rules the day,” he said. “I can’t say if it’s too late to derail the Total deal, but [Treasury] guidelines could change during a Trump administration, and new sanctions can’t be ruled out.” (Foreign Policy, "With the Trump Win, Will Iran's First Post-Sanctions Energy Deal Be Its Last?" 11/9/2016).

--

"The election of Donald Trump as the President of the United States will not have an impact on the investments of French oil and gas company Total in Iran, the firm's head of gas, renewables and power said on Wednesday. Philippe Sauquet told journalist on the sidelines of an energy summit in Paris that a heads of agreement signed by Total earlier this week would not be impacted by the Trump's election... "We have always said that we are interested in returning to Iran on condition that the investments that are proposed to us are sufficiently attractive and knowing that for us, it was out of the question to do anything that would contravene international rules," Sauquet told reporters. "The election that took place in the United States does not change anything," Sauquet said." (Reuters, "Total says Trump's election will not have an impact on Iran gas deal," 11/9/2016).

--

"France's Total has signed a deal with Iran to further develop its part of the world's largest gas field, becoming the first western energy company to sign a major deal with Tehran since the lifting of international sanctions earlier this year. Total confirmed on Tuesday it had signed a heads of agreement with National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) for the Phase 11 development of South Pars in the Gulf, which extends into Qatari waters where it is known as the North field. The SP11 project will progress in two stages, the first costing an estimated $2 billion, Total said. The produced gas will be fed into Iran's gas network. The French company has already played a key role in Iran's energy industry, including the development of phases 2 and 3 of South Pars in the 2000s, before pulling out of the country after international sanctions were imposed in 2010... Total said it would operate the SP11 project and have a 50.1 percent stake in it. Petropars, a subsidiary of the National Iranian Oil Company, will have a 19.9 percent stake while state-China National Petroleum Corp (CNPC) will have a 30 percent stake." (Reuters, "Total signs first post-sanctions Western energy deal with Iran," 11/8/2016).

--

"French oil company Total SA said it would avoid U.S. sanctions on Iran by using its own euro-denominated cash to finance the first Western energy deal in the Islamic Republic since international restrictions over its nuclear program were lifted this year. “This confirms we have a capacity to work with the Iranian government and that there is reciprocal trust,” Total’s Chief Executive Patrick Pouyanné said Tuesday... Mr. Pouyanné said Total will avoid the remaining sanctions still applied on Iran by the U.S. by using its own cash to finance its share of the investment. The Iranian government will pay Total in gas condensates, which the company can then sell on the international markets, bypassing the Iranian financial system." (The Wall Street Journal, "Total to Finance Iran Project With Euros to Avoid U.S. Sanctions," 11/8/2016).

--

"Iran is set to sign a preliminary deal with Total SA Tuesday to help develop an offshore gas field, the first under its new oil-contract framework with a foreign company, an oil-ministry official in Tehran said Monday. The agreement with the French oil giant is a key step toward the return of Western companies to the Islamic Republic’s giant fields, after a nuclear agreement with world powers ended international sanctions on its oil industry in January. The so-called “heads of agreement” to develop phase 11 of the giant South Pars gas field will also include China National Petroleum Corporation and Iran’s state-owned Petropars, and will represent an investment of $6 billion, a press official at the oil-ministry said." (The Wall Street Journal, "Iran to Sign $6 Billion Gas-Field Deal with Total, CNPC," 11/7/2016).

--

"Iran continues its quest for new crude buyers, especially in Europe, but its loyal customer base will continue to hinge on countries like India and China, whose demand for Iranian crude has observed a steady rise this year. Iran has found interest for its crude in some unusual places in the past few months as it continues it diversify its list of buyers. Earlier this month it agreed to sell 1 million barrels of crude oil to Hungary via Croatia as it seeks to widen its post-sanctions customer base, which now includes cargoes sold to oil major BP, France's Total, Greece's Hellenic Petroleum, Spain's Repsol and Cepsa, Russia's Lukoil, Poland's Grupa Lotos, Portugal's Petrogal and Italy's Saras and Iplom. Iran said it has held talks with Bosnia and Herzegovina this week as it hopes to expand its list of crude oil export destinations. However, its shipments to Asia remain the pillar of its export market." (Platts, "Analysis: Iran eyes new crude oil buyers, Asia remains linchpin," 11/1/2016).

--

"A new round of talks between Iran and UOP LLC Petroleum industry company of America has kicked off over investment and supply of new technologies. Association of Petrochemical Industry Corporations (APIC) announced that a fresh round of negotiations has begun between Iran’s petrochemical officials and three major American and European petrochemical companies with the main axes of talks being construction of new polymer units, knowledge and technology transfer as well as issuance of license for new petchem plans. On the sidelines of K Trade Fair 2016, the world's premier fair for the plastics and rubber industry in Germany, high ranking officials of Iran’s petrochemical industry held meetings with authorities of France’s Total and Air Liquide as well as America’s UOP, formerly known as Universal Oil Products." (Mehr News, "US petchem giant ready to return to Iran," 10/24/2016).

--

"The country may tender the first field, the South Azadegan deposit, to international companies as early as November, NIOC Managing Director Kardor said. Total SA of France had been developing a technical program for development of the field after signing a data-sharing agreement with Iran earlier this year, Kardor said. NIOC signed 10 agreements giving foreign companies access to data on its fields with the aim of bringing in partners to boost output, he said. Total is also in the running to develop Iran's South Pars 11 gas development, Kardor said. A first oil development agreement with an international company could be signed by March for South Azadegan, he said." (Bloomberg News, "Iran Boosting Oil Production in Possible Hitch to OPEC Deal," 10/17/2016).

--

In 2014 Total was removed from Pennsylvania Treasury's List of Scrutinized Companies Determined as Having Involvement In Iran because it was determined the companies business was in the past. 
 

--

"Total SA faces a trial in France on allegations it made illegal payments to an Iranian official for oil and gas contracts, according to prosecutors. The biggest French company by market value stands charged with 'corruption of foreign public officials,' a spokeswoman in the Paris prosecutors' office said, asking not to be named because of office policy. Two intermediaries will also be tried for alleged complicity, she said. A date has yet to be set. The decision to go to trial, by a French judge days before former Chief Executive Officer Christophe de Margerie died in a plane crash last month, follows Total's agreement in May 2013 to pay $398 million to settle U.S. allegations. It also resolved related claims with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission... The prosecutor recommended on the day of the company's U.S. settlement that Total, de Margerie and two others stand trial. Total paid $60 million in bribes to an Iranian official from 1995 to 2004 to obtain rights in three oil and gas fields, including South Pars, according to a statement of facts in the deferred-prosecution agreement. Total admitted to the conduct described in the statement of facts, according to the agreement, which was signed by Peter Herbel, Total's general counsel." (Bloomberg, "Total Faces French Trial on Iran-Corruption Claim After U.S Deal," 11/26/14)

--

"Iran's oil minister met BP PLC and Total SA on Wednesday, in a sign of renewed interest for the country's oil sector. International sanctions ban Western oil companies from entering Iran's oil fields. Earlier this week, Tehran failed to reach a final nuclear agreement with world powers, which could have eased such restrictions. Speaking to reporters, Iranian oil minister Bijan Zanganeh said he met representatives of BP PLC--the first such reported meeting with the British oil giant--and France's Total SA to discuss a possible entry in the country. Total, which was represented by new Chief Executive Officer Patrick Pouyanne, and BP have both previously said they won't work in Iran unless sanctions are lifted. Separately, Mr Zanganeh also met Vagit Alekperov, president of Russian oil giant Lukoil. Speaking to reporters, Mr. Alekperov said that 'as soon as sanctions [are] lifted, we are hoping [to] enter' the country. He also said Lukoil would like to participate in bidding round for new oil contracts which is due early next year, but which has been postponed several times." (Dow Jones, "Iranian Oil Minister Meets With BP, Total and Lukoil," 11/26/14)

--

"At least five companies with U.S. government contracts were in Tehran last week to attend the Iran Oil Show, a several day conference that enables international corporations to hobnob with top Iranian officials and plan for a full return to Tehran’s lucrative energy market, according to an analysis of the 600 companies that attended the oil expo. At least 20 of the companies in attendance at the oil show maintain a U.S. presence or have contracts with the U.S. government, eliciting concern from watchdog groups that these companies could be helping Iran breach U.S. sanctions…The overwhelming attendance at this year’s Iran Oil Show—a reported 300 percent increase over past years—serves as another sign that the Obama administration’s recent rollback in sanctions on Iran has been viewed as a green light to reenter the Iranian marketplace…'It is a telling indication of the weakening of the international sanctions regime when firms with U.S. presence and U.S. government contracts openly publicize their attendance at an exhibition for Iran’s most heavily sanctioned sector,' said Matan Shamir, research director for the advocacy group United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI), which has been closely tracking and publicly admonishing those companies seeking to do business with Iran. Energy and electrical giant Siemens, which maintains a large U.S. presence, and the French energy companyTotal, which also has a large U.S. presence, were both reportedly in attendance. Siemens has received more than $3 billion in government contracts with the Department of Veteran Affairs, the Pentagon, and DHS, among others. Total has been awarded more than $2 billion in contracts with the Pentagon, DHS, and the Treasury Department. Other government contractors that attended the Iran Oil Show include: the manufacturing firm Leoni, which has had around $82,000 in government contracts; the industrial firm Nexans, which has had more than $157,000 in contracts; and pump manufacturer Nikkiso, which has had more than $118,000 in contracts.” (Washington Free Beacon, “U.S. Government Contractors Attend Iran Oil Show,” 5/14/14)

--

"Iran's annual oil and gas fair opens in Tehran on Tuesday, with 600 foreign companies seeking to position themselves for a return to large-scale operations if international sanctions are lifted…Regional representatives from France's Total and the German conglomerate Siemens are among 600 foreign companies registered for the International Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Refining Exhibition, according to government officials. The number is three times higher than in 2013, Nematollahi Akbar, a spokesman for Iran's Oil Ministry, told AFP, noting that 1,200 Iranian firms will attend, up 50 percent. ‘Total and Siemens will be represented by their regional officials and Chinese companies are present this year,’ Akbar said.” (AFP, “Iran tests foreign interest with oil fair,” 5/6/14)

--

“Total SA (FP) Chief Executive Officer Christophe de Margerie defended a visit by a French trade delegation last week to Iran as a way for companies to gain a competitive edge should sanctions be lifted. ‘When it becomes legal to work in Iran and contractual terms are satisfactory, I don’t see why Total would deprive itself of the possibility to beat out its Anglo-Saxon competitors in Iran,’ de Margerie said today at a press conference. ‘We have the right to move, that’s not illegal.’ The U.S. has criticized the visit, during which more than 100 representatives of French businesses including oil producer Total met top Iranian trade officials in Tehran.”  (Bloomberg, “Total CEO Defends France's Trade Overtures to Iran,” 2/12/14)

--

"A visit to Iran by a large French business delegation drew a stern warning from Washington that most US sanctions remain in place and will be enforced even against allies. The 116-strong French delegation, with representatives from major companies like Total, Lafarge and Peugeot, was the largest of its kind from Europe since a landmark nuclear deal reached with the major powers in November gave Iran limited relief from crippling US and EU sanctions. French employers' union vice president Thierry Courtaigne said the delegation, which arrived in Tehran Monday, wanted to assess the commercial opportunities opened up by the easing of Western sanctions…The French were given a warm welcome by Iranian leaders, who promised new measures to encourage foreign investment, particularly in its oil and gas sector. In a speech to them, Deputy Oil Minister Ali Majedi said Iran's latest five-year plan, running from 2010-2015, calls for $230 billion of investment in its petroleum industry, of which $150 billion would go to upstream activities, according to the official IRNA news agency. He said nearly all downstream projects, for refineries and distribution, would be offered on a build-operate-transfer (BOT) or build-own-operate-transfer (BOOT) basis.” (AFP, “French business push in Iran draws US sanctions warning,” 2/4/14)

--

“U.S. officials are fanning out across the globe, privately warning international executives not to commit too much as they re-engage with Iran during a temporary easing of sanctions…At a meeting at the U.S. Embassy in London this week, Peter Harrell, the U.S. State Department's deputy assistant secretary for threat finance and sanctions, met British and French executives—including representatives from Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Total SA and the aircraft-engine division of Rolls-Royce PLC—to make it clear that any business now allowed with Iran must be limited to the six-month window of the deal, according to people familiar with the matter. ’The message we got is that you can't sign any long-term commitment,’ said one executive who participated in the London meeting. Spokesmen for Total, Shell and Rolls-Royce said they don't comment on meetings held by their executives.” (Wall Street Journal, “U.S. Warns Over Limits of Iran Sanctions Easing,” 1/31/14)

--

“Iran [welcomes] the most senior French trade delegation in years on Monday, telling more than 100 executives that the farsighted among them stood to win the race for business following an easing of some economic sanctions…’A new chapter has begun in relations between Iran and Europe,’ Mohammad Nahavandian, President Hassan Rouhani's chief of staff, was quoted as saying by the official IRNA news agency. ‘You should carry the message back that potential for cooperation with Iran is real and not to be overlooked,’ he told the delegation. ‘Those with longer foresight stand to win this race.’ The delegation of more than 100 executives from Medef, the French employers' association, on a Feb 2-5 trip, met Nahavandian and members of Iran's Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture, IRNA said. A source close to the delegation told Reuters it was the most senior group of entrepreneurs and financiers to visit Iran since the 1979 revolution, representing the defence, aviation, petrochemicals, automotive, shipping and cosmetics sectors. Among companies represented were Safran, Airbus , Total, GDF-Suez, Renault, Alcatel, Alstom, Amundi and L'Oréal, the source said. ‘Many of these firms have worked in Iran before and their goal now is to restore links,’ the source said. ‘The very makeup of the delegation shows these people are here to evaluate potential for cooperation.’ A French embassy source in Tehran said the visit was merely exploratory and ‘nothing is to be signed this time around.’” (Reuters, “Iran welcomes French business chiefs after sanctions eased,” 2/3/14)

--

"Iran will have a new, attractive investment model for oil contracts by September, its president and oil minister told some of the world's top oil executives here on Thursday, part of its drive to win back Western business. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and Oil Minister Bijan Zanganeh said their new administration was keen to open up to Western investments and technology, executives who attended the meeting said. They also stressed the importance of fossil fuel, with global energy demand rising. ‘The fact that the president of Iran came to the meeting today... is clearly a sign that Iran wants to open up to international oil companies,’ said Paolo Scaroni, chief executive of Italy's Eni, who was at the meeting. ’It was an impressive presentation,’ said one of three further oil executives who were at the meeting and spoke with Reuters on condition of anonymity. ’They said they are working on a new model to work with investors and are happy to see us,’ he added. ‘They not only need money but technologies. They are happy to have consultations about how new contracts shall work. They want to decide on the model by September.’ ’The message was - look at us, our geological risks are minimal, reserves are huge, come and we will create competitive terms and you will be happy. Your return on investments will be acceptable,’ another executive said. Along with ENI, France's Total, Britain's BP , LUKoil and GazpromNeft from Russia, and several other companies were present.” (Reuters, “Iran lures oil majors with new contracts pledge,” 1/23/14)

--

"Speaking to reporters ahead of a meeting of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, Iran's oil minister, Bijan Zanganeh, said, 'We have no limitations for U.S. companies.' Asked who he would like to see return or enter Iran, he named European giants Total SA, Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Eni SpA, Statoil ASA and BP PLC…'I am talking to some of them,' he said, without saying which." (Wall Street Journal, "Iran Wants U.S. Companies to Develop Oil Fields," 12/4/13)

--

"Iran’s oil ministry has opened contacts with western majors as the government of Hassan Rouhani tries to capitalise on progress in nuclear talks and encourage companies to prepare for an eventual lifting of sanctions. Bijan Namdar Zanganeh, the veteran oil minister who has returned to government after an eight-year absence, told the Financial Times he had held meetings with European companies and “indirectly” with US firms with a view to inviting them back to Iran. In his first interview with the foreign media, the minister who persuaded the likes of Total, Royal Dutch Shell, Eni and Statoil to invest in the oil and gas sector in the 1990s despite US sanctions, said these companies were now among those he was seeking to attract back to Iran…Some oil majors appear to be open to an Iranian approach. When asked last month if Total would return to Iran if sanctions were lifted, Christophe de Margerie, chief executive of the French energy group, replied: 'Of course.' Indeed, last month its head of exploration and production for the Middle East, Arnaud Breuillac, travelled to Tehran to meet the head of Iran’s national company, Rokneddin Javadi, reportedly telling him that Total would resume oil and gas operations in Iran as soon as sanctions were lifted." (Financial Times, "Iran opens contacts with oil groups," 11/26/13)

--

"The relaxation of sanctions on Iran promises an opening for international companies that have been sidelined from one of the Middle East's largest consumer markets…The deal is 'good news toward the normalization of the international [community's] relationships with Iran,' said a representative for Total SA, which ended talks with Iran over a big natural-gas project as European sanctions tightened over the past few years." (Wall Street Journal, "Iran Deal Has Western Firms Eager to Resume Business,"  11/24/13)

--

"Iran is courting international energy giants such as Chevron Corp., Total SA and Royal Dutch Shell PLC, eager to attract Western investment back to the oil industry if it wins sanctions relief in its troubled nuclear talks with Western countries. Iranian officials involved in the overtures, who described the talks, said the country is eager to start re-establishing ties with Western companies to speed more substantial talks about investment if the world powers negotiating with Iran in Geneva reach an agreement. The outreach has been low key and in some cases, unsuccessful…Talking with Iranian officials isn't always a violation of sanctions. U.S. sanctions specifically prohibit discussions over possible investments in Iran for American companies. Many European companies have kept up contact with Iranian officials and executives over the years, even as they've ceased operations and meaningful dialogue about projects. In 2010, Total, Shell and Spain's Repsol SA pulled out of talks to enter a giant Iranian natural-gas development to comply with EU sanctions. According to two Iranian oil officials, the National Iranian Oil Co. has suggested recently to Total executives that it could assist in the final stages of that project—five development phases of the South Pars natural-gas field, now being developed by Iranian companies, are scheduled to be completed in the coming two years. 'They want to determine a framework for cooperation' with Total, said an official with Pars Oil & Gas Co., the state-controlled company overseeing the field. The official said the proposed efforts wouldn't involve large investments but would ensure Total a future foothold in Iran's oil-and-gas sector. The French company's vice president for the Middle East, Arnaud Breuillac, met last month with the head of NIOC, Roknoddin Javadi, at the state-company's Tehran headquarters, according to people familiar with the meeting. Mr. Breuillac has since been promoted to lead the company's overall exploration and production arm from Jan 1. In recent days, however, contacts between Iran and Total have chilled after Tehran accused Paris of scuttling a nuclear deal, Iranian oil officials said. Chevron, Total and Shell all said that they were complying with sanctions, or declined to comment on talks with Iranian officials or didn't respond to calls requesting comment. 'We'll go back to Iran when and if international sanctions are lifted,' a Total spokesman said." (Wall Street Journal, "Iran Courting Western Oil Companies in Case Sanctions Are Eased," 11/21/13)

--

"In anticipation of a thaw, Iran is preparing to capitalize on improved relations with the West. And to win skeptics over to the idea that crippling economic sanctions targeting Iran should be dropped, Tehran is floating a huge incentive -- the prospect of giving Western investors access to the country's vast oil and gas reserves. Western-friendly Oil Minister Bijan Zanganeh has been sending signals that the new spirit of openness being displayed by Iranian officials could extend to Iran's energy market…Christophe de Margerie, the chief executive of the French energy giant Total, told reporters that his company was eager to return to Iran if sanctions were eased and Tehran made energy contracts more lucrative." (Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty, "Iran Floats Prospect Of Opening Energy Industry To West," 10/15/13).

--

"Peter Voser, chief executive of Royal Dutch Shell, and Christophe de Margerie, his counterpart at France’s Total, used the Oil & Money conference in London on Tuesday to highlight the potential energy windfall if sanctions preventing international oil companies from dealing with Tehran were lifted... He was echoed by Mr de Margerie, who said that he hoped doing business with Iran would again be permitted 'as soon as possible, not just for Total but for the world and for Iran. Any country cannot stay out of the system.' Before the tightening of sanctions against Iran a few years ago, Shell and Total were two of the most active companies doing business with the Islamic republic... The project was completed in 2005. Until 2009, Total was involved in the drawn-out development of Iran’s vast South Pars natural gas field, also in the Gulf’s waters." (The Telegraph, "Tapping Iran’s oil and gas vital for world demand, say Shell and Total," 10/1/2013) 

--

"French energy giant Total will return to Iran, if international sanctions are lifted on petroleum exports, chief executive Christophe de Margerie said at an industry conference here on Tuesday. Questioned by reporters about whether the company would return to the Islamic republic, should sanctions be lifted, de Margerie replied: 'Of course.'The Total chief spoke at the Oil & Money conference, a key industry event which is held each year in the British capital…'Why, if Iran is back in the (international) community should we decide just ourselves that they are banned?' de Margerie told reporters. 'Today there is an embargo. This embargo is valid for everybody and we will wait for this embargo to be lifted.' De Margerie hoped that this would happen 'as soon as possible.' He added: 'Of course we will have to discuss the contractual terms. Just like any other country it will be just based on 'is it a win-win between them and us.' 'We like to be a long-term partner and we have long-term vision when we are doing long-term deals.'" (AP, "Total will return to Iran if sanctions lifted," 10/1/12)

--

"Iran is asking French oil giant Total SA (TOT) to resume refuelling its passenger aircraft and has even raised the question with the French president, an Iranian official said recently. The move underscores Iran's hopes that the election in May of a new French administration could lead to a thaw between the two countries. Iran asked French President Francois Hollande last month to intercede with Total over the refuelling of its aircraft. "He said he would look into it," the Iranian official said. Under Mr. Hollande's predecessor, Nicolas Sarkozy, France led a European push to tighten sanctions against Iran, culminating in a European Union embargo July 1. But the Islamic Republic hopes France will soften its stance under Mr. Hollande, who was elected in May. Tehran also appealed directly to Total's Chief Executive Christophe de Margerie for the resumption of refuelling of the national airline planes, the person said. A Total spokesperson confirmed the company had stopped 'deliveries of jet fuel to Iran Air in March 2011, due to the evolution of the relationship between Iran and the international community.'" (Fox News, "Iran Asks France's Total To Resume Refuelling Passenger Planes-Source," 8/21/12)

--

"French oil company Total SA booked a 316 million euro ($389 million) charge to its accounts on Friday to cover the likely cost of settlement with U.S. authorities over an investigation into corruption in Iran.

The investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice dates back to 2003, and is in connection with gas contracts awarded in the oil and gas producing Gulf country in the 1990s.

Total and its chief executive Christophe de Margerie, who was in charge of its Middle East division at the time, have been under investigation in France in connection with the same affair since 2006.

Western Europe's third largest oil industry player, Total has been talking to the U.S. authorities about an out of court settlement since 2010, and late last year, the SEC made a proposal that included fines, but was rejected by Total." (Reuters, "Total takes 316 mln euro charge for Iran graft probe," 7/27/12) 

--

"Refiners in South Africa include Shell, BP, Total, Chevron, petrochemicals group Sasol , and Engen, majority-owned by Malaysian state oil group Petronas." (Reuters, "S.Africa keen to replace Iranian crude with Nigerian," 5/24/2012)

--

"Foreign firms dealing with Iran's oil and gas sector admit that severe Western sanctions are taking their toll on business, despite Tehran talking up its ambitions at the opening of an international industry exhibition this week. The International Oil, Gas, Refining and Petrochemical Exhibition, held in northern Tehran, was three-quarters filled by Iranian companies working at every level of the industry, from the biggest to ones involved in peripheral activities such as instruments, quality inspections and oil barrel manufacturing. There were 315 foreign stands, down from the 496 present at last year's trade show. Some of the biggest foreign companies that had been major partners in the industry, such as the Anglo-Dutch group Shell and Italy's ENI, were not present. Others, such as the China Petroleum Technology and Development Corporation, the French-Iranian joint venture Beh Total and Norway's Statoil, did have stands -- but representatives there told AFP they had been instructed by their bosses to give no comments at all to journalists." (Agence France-Press, "Foreign firms say times tough in Iran's energy sector," 4/18/12)

--

"French oil major Total SA stopped buying Iranian crude oil for its refineries and trading activities at the end of 2011, six months ahead of the effective implementation of a European embargo on Iran's oil, and has partly replaced it with oil from Saudi Arabia, Chief Financial Officer Patrick de la Chevardiere said Friday. Total's acknowledgment that it has substituted some Iranian crude oil with Saudi oil is the first such public comment by a major European oil company since the European Union decided last month to embargo Iranian oil. The company's previous Iranian crude-oil supply had been 'some heavy oil that was well suited for our French refineries,' and the substitution crude oil the group has found since it stopped buying from Iran is 'a bit more complicated to process,' Mr. de la Chevardiere said in an interview." (Wall Street Journal, "Total Looks to Saudis," 2/13/12) 

--

In 2011, Total was added to the Pennsylvania Treasury's List of Scrutinized Companies Determined as Having Involvement in Iran because of oil-related investment of US $20 million since 1996.
 

--

"This year, 166 Chinese companies are present at the fair compared to 100 companies last year,' a senior oil ministry official said. 'The number of foreign companies are up 35 percent,' to 496 out of the total 1,550, he said. He said that despite UN sanctions and bilateral punitive measures by the United States and the European Union against Iran, 'Germany is present with 64 companies, Italy with 36, Britain with 37, Spain with 14, France with 15 and South Korea with 33 companies.' Major Western energy groups such as Total of France, Norwegian Statoil and OMV of Austria, who have withdrawn from Iran, made a 'symbolic' appearance at the fair." (AFP, "Chinese Firms Dominate Iran Oil Exhibition," 4/15/11)

--

"Total SA (TOT) and Royal Dutch Shell PLC (RDSB.LN) discreetly contacted Iranian authorities last week, seeking to reassure the Islamic Republic after telling the U.S. they have no plans for further investments for now, people familiar with the matter said in recent days. Total and Shell contacted Iran as the U.S. announced commitments by the companies "to terminate their investments and avoid any new activity in Iran's energy sector." The disclosure was made by the State Department in a Sept. 30 press release, which also said Statoil ASA (STO) and Eni SpA (E) had made similar commitments. Though the two companies are not breaching any sanctions in communicating with Iran, the contacts suggest they have not renounced their long-term ambitions in Iran, which hosts the world's second-largest natural gas resources and stands as the fourth-largest global oil exporter....Total and Shell still do some direct business with Iran, regularly buying crude oil from the Middle Eastern country. But the Anglo-Dutch oil company has come under pressure for the trades, which are not prohibited under European sanctions." (Wall Street Journal, "Total, Shell Keep Line Open With Tehran Despite US Claim," 10/8/2010)

"Open sources reported that Total sold gasoline to Iran in 2009 and 2010, but subsequently stopped in 2010." (U.S. Government Accountability Office, Report: "Firms Reported in Open Sources to Have Sold Iran Refined Petroleum Products between January 1, 2009 and June," September 3, 2010)

--
"On September 30th, Total made a "pledge to stop investing in Iran's energy sector" as a result of pressure from American sanctions (AP, "US hits Iranian energy firm with sanctions," 9/30/2010). However, Total has continued to purchase Iranian crude oil, claiming that the purchases are "not illegal under the latest United Nations sanctions" (Reuters, "Oil majors tell US still have some Iran dealings," 9/30/2010). 

"An oil tanker named Front Page, chartered by Royal Dutch Shell PLC, left this port on March 17 and reported it was going to another U.A.E. port, then on to Saudi Arabia, ship-tracking data show.

But the tracking information reveals that Front Page also made an unreported stop—to the coast of Iran. There it loaded Iranian oil, according to records obtained by oil traders and shipping sources.

The incident, some oil-industry experts say, is an example of how some companies these days are hiding their business dealings with Iran, even when they are perfectly legal because they aren't subject to any sanctions.

Another oil tanker that stopped in Iran in March, which oil traders say was chartered by Total SA of France, turned off its tracking transponder throughout the visit, according to ship-tracking data...

Still, given all the controversy over Iran's nuclear program, many companies decline to discuss their Iranian oil purchases. Companies like Shell and BP have said they have stopped selling gasoline to Iran.

In the case of the Total-chartered vessel, an Iranian-owned tanker named Saveh, AIS data show it reported its destination as Kharg Island, an Iranian oil-export terminal, on Feb. 28." (The Wall Street Journal. "Oil Trade with Iran Thrives, Discreetly," 5/20/10)

--

"Total has long been a player in Iran's oil and gas development industry. A $2 billion investment in 1998 by a consortium it led in Iran's South Pars gas fields was deemed by the Clinton administration to violate the Iran Sanctions Act, but the president exercised his right to waive sanctions. More recently, Total announced a decision to hold off on future oil and gas development projects investments. But in February 2010 its chief executive, Christophe de Margerie, said that it once again had its eye on Iran's gas reserves, despite international pressure. "The balance of supply and demand in the world, notably for gas, depends also on Iran," he said in comments published in the French newspaper Le Monde. In the meantime, Total spokesperson Jim Floren confimed that the company continues to sell Iran gasoline, and maintains an office in Tehran."  From 2000-2009, the company was the recipient of $1.1 billion US federal funds.  Their business in Iran is currently active.  They are potentially violators of the Iran Sanctions Act. (The New York Times, "Profiting from Iran, and the US," 3/6/2010)

--

"A senior Iranian energy official said on Monday the value of a possible new liquefied natural gas development deal with France's Total (TOTF.PA) had fallen to $7.5-8 billion, state broadcaster IRIB reported... Total declined to be drawn on the details of any possible deals in Iran. 'We have no comment to make. However, Iran remains a country of interest to us in the long term,' a Total spokeswoman said." (Reuters, "Iran sees possible Total deal worth $7.5-8 bln," 10/12/09)

--

"New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli also announced Tuesday the $110 billion fund would freeze an additional $300 million in seven other companies...The decision comes after two years of reviewing these companies, the potential risk of the investments and, in some cases, humanitarian efforts in these countries. 'We don't expect our investments to benefit regimes that support genocide and terrorism,' said DiNapoli...The fund also plans to monitor and prohibit further investment in ENI (E), Repsol YPF (REP), Royal Dutch Shell PLC (RDSA), Total SA (TOT), ABB Ltd. (ABB), Alstom (ALO.FR) and Snam Rete Gas (SNMRY). Additionally, it plans to focus on other industries including telecommunications." (Wall Street Journal, "NY Comptroller To Divest $86.2M In State Pension Fund Investments," 6/30/09 and The Office of New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli)

--

"Because of a lack of domestic refining capacity, oil-rich Iran is dependent on gasoline imports to meet about 40 percent of domestic consumption. Iran gets most of its gasoline imports from the Swiss firm Vitol, the Swiss/Dutch firm Trafigura, France's Total, the Swiss firm Glencore and British Petroleum, as well as the Indian firm Reliance." (Agence-France Press, "US lawmakers target Iran gasoline imports," 6/23/09)

--

"Iranian Executive Director of the Continental Shelf Oil Company (Iranian national oil company) Mahmoud Zirkjian Alizada said on Friday that his company signed an agreement worth EURO 32 million with the French company Total to carry out support and planning operation in the Iranian Dorood three refinery." (Kuna News Agency, "Iran Oil company signs oil agreement with French Total, worth EURO 32 mln," 4/25/09)

--

"Nestle has been the target of protests by Islamists since the Gaza onslaught began, some Iranian websites said. It is among a small number of foreign companies which have factories in Iran, which notably also includes French automaker Renault. Others, such as South Korean group Samsung, market their products in the Islamic republic. Some, particularly in the oil and gas sector, have operated in the country for some time, such as Frances Total and Anglo-Dutch Shell." (Agence France Presse, "Iran to punish firms trading with Israel," 1/12/09)

--

"In recent months, Iran has, according to the respected trade publication International Oil Daily and other sources including the U.S. government, purchased nearly all of this gasoline from just five companies, four of them European: the Swiss firm Vitol; the Swiss/Dutch firm Trafigura; the French firm Total; British Petroleum; and one Indian company, Reliance Industries." (The Wall Street Journal, "How To Put The Squeeze On Iran," 11/13/08)

--

"State-owned China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) is negotiating the acquisition of a 25% stake in the Pars LNG liquefied natural gas (LNG) export project with the Iranian government. Under the terms of the deal French major Total would see its stake in Pars LNG reduced from 40% to 25%." (Middle East and Africa Oil and Gas Insights, "CNPC Looking At Pars LNG Deal," 10/1/08)

--

"The French oil company Total said it would pull out of a big investment in an Iranian gas field - a blow to Tehran, which is keen to exploit its gas reserves, and a victory for the Bush administration, which has been seeking to isolate Iran's government. A company spokeswoman said it was too risky to invest in Iran now." (Guardian, "US warning follows Iran missile tests," 7/18/08)

--

"Total, an energy giant, said this week it was giving up plans to invest in Iran because of the risk." (The Economist, "Coming to a city near you; Israel and Iran," 7/12/08)

--

"French energy group Total has said it is now too risky to invest in Iran. The company was planning to invest in a liquefied natural gas project linked to Irans South Pars gas field in the near future, but is now expected not to. The decision comes after weeks of increasing tension between Iran and Israel, which is destabilising the region." (The Daily Telegraph, "Total says Iran too dangerous for investment," 7/10/08)

--

"William Burns, U.S. Under Secretary of State for political affairs, pointed out that several big energy companies, including Total, Shell, ENI and Repsol, have scaled back their business in Iran over the past few years." (Reuters, "US to review if Statoil violates Iran sanctions law," 7/9/08)

--

"Total, Shell and Repsol of Spain are hanging back from signing contracts, which the Iranians are desperate for them to sign, said Simon Henderson, an oil expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy." (Associated Press, "Iran looks to tap key oil field with homegrown crews," 5/11/08)

--

"Gazprom, together with Frances Total and Malaysias Petronas, has already invested in phases 2-3 of massive South Pars gas field, a project worth around $2 billion." (Reuters, "Gazprom, Iran agree new large energy projects," 2/19/08)

--

Listed by U.S. Government as doing business in Iran. (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, List of Companies Doing Business With State Sponsors Of Terror, Removed from the Internet in July 2007)

--

"GIANTS WITH A FOOT IN TEHRAN: Total, Shell, Statoil, BNP Paribas, Commerzbank, MTN, UPS, Linde, Technip, Nokia, Ericsson, Peugeot, Renault, OMV, Societe Generale, ENI, Mitsubishi, Sumitomo, Siemens, LG, Samsung, Bosch, Valeo, Nestle, Unilever, BAT, Japan Tobacco." (The London Times, "American pressure threatens UK firms," 5/27/06)

Response

"Total is currently contemplating projects in Iran and as such, signed non-binding agreements with the National Iranian Oil Company (“NIOC”).” (February 23, 2017)

--

Response: "conducts its business in compliance with all applicable laws..." (May 9, 2016). -- "We returned to Iran in strict compliance with international law following the suspension of certain international economic sanctions against the country on January 16, 2016. We notably operate in exploration and production and trading and shipping." 

--
Total has announced its plans to halt new investment in Iran, as a result of rising political pressure. (“Iran, Sanctions and the Memo,” The New York Times, April 19, 2010)

Total also stated it will end gasoline sales to Iran if U.N. passes sanctions bill is passed by the U.N. (“Total to end Iran fuel sale if sanctions approved,” Daily Times, April 27, 2010)

In June 2010, Total confirmed that it had suspended gasoline sales to Iran in the wake of American and EU sanctions ("Total Halts Gas Sales to Iran," Wall Street Journal, 6/28/2010).

Technip

Industry
Engineering
Symbol
EPA: FIT
States
CA
TX
Country
France
Sources

In 2018, Technip was listed as a divested security on the Michigan State Retirement System list for active business operations in Iran. 

--

According to its Quarterly Report filed with the SEC for fiscal year 2018: "We had submitted bids to or had discussions with companies in Iran, including some that may be owned or controlled by the Government of Iran, regarding potential future projects in Iran. In third quarter 2018, we withdrew all pending bids in Iran and will not accept a contract award related to such a project."

--

We intend to withdraw all pending bids related to Iran and will not accept a contract award related to such a project. (6/30/18)

--

In 2017 the U.S. state of Michigan listed Technip as an Iran restricted company rendering Technip ineligible for investment and/or state contracting.

--

"Iran’s Jam Petrochemical Complex (JPC) is currently in final stages of talks with Germany’s Linde Group and France’s TechnipFMC for an agreement to expand its ethylene production at its site in the southern province of Bushehr." (November 15, 2017).

--

According to its 2018 SEC disclosure, "two of our non-U.S. subsidiaries have contracts with entities in Iran. We have prepared a feasibility study related to improvements to an olefins plant in Iran. We are also providing engineering and design services for the construction of an ethylene plant in Iran, which is expected to be completed by the end of 2018." (2017)

--

In 2014 Technip was removed from Pennsylvania Treasury's List of Scrutinized Companies Determined as Having Involvement In Iran because it was determined to have past involvement.
 

--

In 2011, Technip was added to the Pennsylvania Treasury's List of Scrutinized Companies Determined as Having Involvement in Iran because of oil-related investment of US $20 million since 1996.

--

Listed by U.S. Government as doing business in Iran. (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, List of Companies Doing Business With State Sponsors Of Terror, Removed from the internet in July of 2007)

--

"There is also the question, not mentioned by De Margerie, of where Iran would source LNG technology. Most key components used in projects around the world are manufactured in the US. NIGC says it has been negotiating with European firms, including Linde and Technip, but it is hard to see either working closely with Iran until the political situation improves." (Petroleum Economist, "The struggle to market," April 2007)

--

GIANTS WITH A FOOT IN TEHRAN: Total, Shell, Statoil, BNP Paribas, Commerzbank, MTN, UPS, Linde, Technip, Nokia, Ericsson, Peugeot, Renault, OMV, Societe Generale, ENI, Mitsubishi, Sumitomo, Siemens, LG, Samsung, Bosch, Valeo, Nestle, Unilever, BAT, Japan Tobacco. (The London Times, American pressure threatens UK firms, May 27, 2006)

Response

No response at this time.

Equinor ASA (Statoil)

Industry
Energy
Symbol
NYSE:STO
States
CT
DC
TX
Country
Norway
Contact Information
Sources

According to its Annual Report filed with the SEC for fiscal year 2019: "Equinor is providing the following disclosure pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act. Equinor is a party to agreements with the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), namely, a Development Service Contract for South Pars Gas Phases 6, 7 & 8 (offshore part), an Exploration Service Contract for the Anaran Block and an Exploration Service Contract for the Khorramabad Block, which are located in Iran. Equinor’s operational obligations under these agreements have terminated and the licences have been abandoned. The cost recovery programme for these contracts was completed in 2012, except for the recovery of tax and obligations to the Social Security Organization (SSO).

From 2013 to November 2018, after closing Equinor’s office in Iran, Equinor’s activity was focused on a final settlement with the Iranian tax and SSO authorities relating to the above-mentioned agreements.

In a letter from the US State Department of 1 November 2010, Equinor was informed that [it] was not considered to be a company of concern based on its previous Iran-related activities.

Equinor has an intention to settle historic obligations in Iran while remaining compliant with applicable sanctions and trade restrictions against Iran. Since November 2018 Equinor has not conducted any activity in Iran, nor has it been able to resolve tax claims from the Iranian authorities. No payments were made to Iranian authorities during 2019."

--

According to its Annual report filed with the SEC for fiscal year 2018: "Since 2013, after closing Equinor’s office in Iran, Equinor's activity was focused on a final settlement with the Iranian tax and SSO authorities relating to the above-mentioned agreements.

During 2018 Equinor paid the equivalent of USD 20,000 in tax to Iranian authorities. Also, during 2018 Equinor paid the equivalent of USD 50 in stamp duty to Iran Tax Organization. All payments were made in local currency (Iranian Rials). The funds utilised for these purposes were held by Equinor in EN Bank (Iran). Additionally, NIOC, on behalf of Equinor, in 2018 paid a tax obligation of USD 0.53 million equivalent in Iranian Rial to the local tax authorities and a social security obligation of USD 2.61 million equivalent in Iranian Rial to the social security authorities. The amount was settled towards historical recoverable costs from NIOC to Equinor.

Equinor has provided information about its Iran related activity to the US State Department as well as to the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

In a letter from the US State Department of 1 November 2010, Equinor was informed that the company was not considered to be a company of concern based on its previous Iran-related activities.

Equinor earned no net profit from the aforementioned 2018 activities."

--

"Statoil is a party to agreements with the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), namely, a Development Service Contract for South Pars Gas Phases 6, 7 & 8 (offshore part), an Exploration Service Contract for the Anaran Block and an Exploration Service Contract for the Khorramabad Block, which are located in Iran. Statoil's operational obligations under these agreements have terminated and the licences have been abandoned. The cost recovery programme for these contracts was completed in 2012, except for the recovery of tax and obligations to the Social Security Organisation (SSO). Since 2013, after closing Statoil’s office in Iran, Statoil's activity was focused on a final settlement with the Iranian tax and SSO authorities relating to the above-mentioned agreements." (2018 SEC Disclosure).

--

"Speaking to reporters ahead of a meeting of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, Iran's oil minister, Bijan Zanganeh, said, 'We have no limitations for U.S. companies.' Asked who he would like to see return or enter Iran, he named European giants Total SA, Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Eni SpA, Statoil ASA and BP PLC…'I am talking to some of them,' he said, without saying which." (Wall Street Journal, "Iran Wants U.S. Companies to Develop Oil Fields," 12/4/13)

--

"Economic sanctions on Iran have been getting tougher in recent years, and the United States tightened the screws a little more last summer with the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act. One unusual aspect of that law is that it started requiring companies traded on US stock exchanges to disclose more about the business they're doing with Iran, and the Securities and Exchange Commission created the clunkily named IRANNOTICE filing to help them do it. Companies were already beginning to disclose more about their ties to Iran, Syria, Cuba and other countries non grata (at least in US eyes) under pressure from the SEC. Now they must be systematic about it-and disclose gross revenue and net profits wherever possible. Quartz's partial tally: more than $540 million in gross revenue and $15.5 million in profits for US-listed companies from their business with Iran in 2012-and that's just from 30 or so large companies that have made the disclosures since mid-February... Companies based outside the US accounted for 99% of the revenue and three-quarters of the profit. (They made the disclosures because they list shares or American Depository Receipts on US markets.) In fact, a big chunk of the total came from one company: $414 million in revenue for Statoil ASA, the Norwegian oil and gas company, from Statoil's contracts with the National Iranian Oil Co. Statoil also said it has terminated its agreements with Iran, abandoned it licenses there, and 'will not make any investments in Iran under present circumstances.' That's a common refrain in the disclosures we saw: Many, though not all, of the disclosed transactions reflected companies wrapping up old business en route to cutting most or all ties with the Islamic republic. Typically, the transactions hadn't been prohibited before the new rules kicked in." (Quartz, "US-listed companies doing business in Iran: $540 million in revenue and counting," 3/28/13)

--

"After South Korea,  Norwegian energy giant Statoil was the main buyer of Iranian LPG, industry sources said. Company spokesman Morten Eek said Statoil had taken Iranian LPG as repayment of debts owed by the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) for completed projects on the giant South Pars gas field and exploration on the Anaran and Khoramabad fields. 'We receive the cargo at the LPG terminals in Iran and transport it by ship to markets outside Europe and the USA. Cargoes of LPG serve as down payment of NIOC's debt to us,' he said. 'We have informed the Norwegian and United States authorities on this and we will continue the dialogue to ensure that our activities are in accordance with the current sanctions,' Eek added, without commenting on whether Statoil would be able to continue taking the shipments." (Reuters, "EU sanctions strangle Iranian LPG exports to Asia," 10/31/2012)

 

--

"Naftiran owns a 10 percent stake in the Shah Deniz project in Azerbaijan which is co-led by BP and Norway's Statoil and which is estimated to contain 1.2 trillion cubic meters of gas. The senior EU official said sanctions were structured to protect the Azeri project from financial impact." (Reuters, "EU sanctions target Iran oil, gas, tanker companies," 10/16/2012)

--

"Foreign firms dealing with Iran's oil and gas sector admit that severe Western sanctions are taking their toll on business, despite Tehran talking up its ambitions at the opening of an international industry exhibition this week. The International Oil, Gas, Refining and Petrochemical Exhibition, held in northern Tehran, was three-quarters filled by Iranian companies working at every level of the industry, from the biggest to ones involved in peripheral activities such as instruments, quality inspections and oil barrel manufacturing. There were 315 foreign stands, down from the 496 present at last year's trade show. Some of the biggest foreign companies that had been major partners in the industry, such as the Anglo-Dutch group Shell and Italy's ENI, were not present. Others, such as the China Petroleum Technology and Development Corporation, the French-Iranian joint venture Beh Total and Norway's Statoil, did have stands -- but representatives there told AFP they had been instructed by their bosses to give no comments at all to journalists." (Agence France-Presse, "Foreign firms say times tough in Iran's energy sector," 4/18/12) 

--

"This year, 166 Chinese companies are present at the fair compared to 100 companies last year,' a senior oil ministry official said. 'The number of foreign companies are up 35 percent,' to 496 out of the total 1,550, he said. He said that despite UN sanctions and bilateral punitive measures by the United States and the European Union against Iran, 'Germany is present with 64 companies, Italy with 36, Britain with 37, Spain with 14, France with 15 and South Korea with 33 companies.' Major Western energy groups such as Total of France, Norwegian Statoil and OMV of Austria, who have withdrawn from Iran, made a 'symbolic' appearance at the fair." (AFP, "Chinese Firms Dominate Iran Oil Exhibition," 4/15/11)

--

On September 30th, Statoil made a "pledge to stop investing in Iran's energy sector" as a result of pressure from American sanctions (AP, "US hits Iranian energy firm with sanctions," 9/30/2010). However, Statoil continues to provide technical assistance on Iran's South Pars gas field, saying that such assistance will continue for "three years" (Reuters, "Oil majors tell US still have some Iran dealings," 9/30/2010). 

--

"Statoil maintains an office in Iran. A spokesperson for the company said it continues to provide assistance to the National Iranian Oil Company on a gas drilling platform in the Persian Gulf. But, the spokesperson said, Statoil stopped all new exploration and drilling in Iran as of 2007, adding that the company has no plans to move forward on a license it has to drill in another area of the Persian Gulf."

From 2000-2009, the company was the recipient of 1.4 million acres of US gas/oil fields.  Their investments in Iran are currently active but with no further plans for new investments.  (The New York Times, "Profiting from Iran, and the US," 3/6/2010)

--

"StatoilHydro (STL.OL) said on Tuesday it is considering pulling the families of its foreign workers out of Iran due to security concerns after Friday's presidential elections. StatoilHydro, which is part of the South Pars gas project, has 120 workers in Iran. About half are foreigners." (Reuters, "Statoil says may pull ex-pats' families from Iran," 6/16/09)

--

"StatoilHydro is offshore development operator for phases 6, 7 & 8 of the South Pars gas and condensate field in the Iranian sector of the Persian Gulf. We have also engaged in onshore exploration and drilling activities. Exploration drilling on the Anaran field resulted in promising commercial discoveries in recent years. Work on this project is currently suspended. On Khorram-Abad, we have a commitment to conduct a seismic survey and to drill exploration wells." (Company Website, 7/13/09)

--

"The enormous New York State Common Retirement Fund plans to divest $86.2 million in investments from nine companies doing business in Sudan and Iran...The decision comes after two years of reviewing these companies, the potential risk of the investments and, in some cases, humanitarian efforts in these countries. 'We don't expect our investments to benefit regimes that support genocide and terrorism,' said DiNapoli. The fund plans to divest out of $86 million in Gazprom (OGZPY), Inpex (1605.TO), Lukoil (LUKOY), Oil And Natural Gas Corp (500312.BY), OMV (OMVKY), Petroleo Brasilia (PBR), Statoil (STO), Wartsila OYJ and Sinopec Corp. DiNapoli said the firms were chosen because "they failed to respond or we were not satisfied with their responses" when asked to provide information to the fund on the investments and their risks." (Wall Street Journal, "NY Comptroller To Divest $86.2M In State Pension Fund Investments," 6/30/09)

--

"U.S. outreach to foreign banks and to oil companies considering investing in Iran's energy sector has reportedly convinced more than 80 banks and several major potential oil-field investors to cease all or some of their business with Iran. Among them: Germany's two largest banks (Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank), London-based HSBC, Credit Suisse, Norwegian energy company StatoilHydro, and Royal Dutch Shell." (The Wall Street Journal, "How To Put The Squeeze On Iran," 11/13/08)

--

"The U.S. State Department will review Norwegian oil and gas giant Statoil Hydros role in helping to develop Iranian natural gas to see if it violates a U.S. sanctions law against Tehran, a senior U.S. official told Congress on Wednesday. (Reuters, "US to review if Statoil violates Iran sanctions law," 7/9/08)

--

"Three phases of the South Pars development handled by StatoilHydro ASA are now scheduled to reach full production mid-2009, two years behind schedule." (The Wall Street Journal, "Oil Majors Say US Restrictions Delay Iran Projects," 6/12/08)

--

Listed by U.S. Government as doing business in Iran. (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, List of Companies Doing Business With State Sponsors Of Terror, Removed from the internet in July of 2007) "GIANTS WITH A FOOT IN TEHRAN: Total, Shell, Statoil, BNP Paribas, Commerzbank, MTN, UPS, Linde, Technip, Nokia, Ericsson, Peugeot, Renault, OMV, Societe Generale, ENI, Mitsubishi, Sumitomo, Siemens, LG, Samsung, Bosch, Valeo, Nestle, Unilever, BAT, Japan Tobacco." (The London Times, "American pressure threatens UK firms," 5/27/06)

Response

No response at this time.

Societe Generale

Industry
Banking
Value of USG Contracts
1
Value of USG Contract Source
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/03/06/world/iran-sanctions.html
Symbol
EPA:GLE
States
NY
Country
France
Contact Information
Sources

“As part of talks in Geneva over the nuclear question, Tehran is pressing world powers to speed up trade finance arrangements on humanitarian deals involving both Western and Iranian banks, according to an Iranian government document seen by Reuters and sources familiar with the initiative. Iranian government officials and international trade sources say Tehran wants to simplify complex trade finance arrangements potentially worth billions of dollars, which would alleviate pressure on the country's sanctioned banking system…Iranian government officials said the document, which has been sent to Iran's Supreme National Security Council, tasked with safeguarding Tehran's interests, listed the following banks as ‘available for further actions’: Standard Chartered Bank (London), Societe Generale (Paris), Banque de Commerce et de Placements (BCP) (Geneva), UniCredit Bank (Munich), Commerzbank (Frankfurt), United Bank (Zurich) and BHF Bank (Frankfurt). It was not clear whether these banks had been approached to provide finance. Two business executives familiar with the initiative said they were aware that Standard Chartered, Societe Generale, Commerzbank were among those on the wish list. Commerzbank, Societe Generale, United Bank and BCP all declined to comment. A spokeswoman for Standard Chartered said the bank was not involved and would not get involved in any transaction with any party from Iran.” (Reuters, “Western banks cold-shoulder Iran trade finance scheme,” 3/13/14)

--

"French banks Société Générale and Crédit Agricole are under U.S. investigation for alleged money laundering and sanction breaches involving Iran, Cuba and Sudan, according to a person with direct knowledge of the matter, the latest case in a series of probes of European banks related to embargo violations. The banks are being investigated by the U.S. Treasury Department, the Justice Department, the Manhattan district attorney, and the New York Department of Financial Services, the person said. It's unclear at this point whether any charges could be brought against the two banks or whether the continuing probes could lead to potential fines, the person added. Société Générale and Crédit Agricole had previously disclosed talks with U.S. authorities over potential sanction breaches in corporate filings last year and in early 2010 without providing further details. Spokeswomen for Crédit Agricole and Société Générale declined to comment on the probes beyond the previous statements…Last month, France's largest listed bank BNP Paribas said it had set aside $1.1 billion to cover potential penalties related to transactions in countries under U.S. sanctions. This provision was booked in addition to the bank's existing legal provision of €1.68 billion ($2.34 billion) as of Dec. 31, 2013. The bank is in talks with federal and New York state officials to settle investigations of money laundering and sanctions violations in countries including Iran and Cuba, according to people familiar with negotiations. A BNP Paribas spokeswoman had declined to comment on the details of the probe. Société Générale and Crédit Agricole, however, may not face as large a fine as BNP Paribas could, estimates AlphaValue analyst Christophe Nijdam. ‘The provisions set aside by Société Générale and Crédit Agricole for potential litigation point to a much lower risk,’ added Mr. Nijdam. Société Générale had total provision for potential litigation of €700 million on Dec. 31, 2013, according to corporate filings. Crédit Agricole had set aside €1.1 billion for potential litigation on Dec. 31, 2012 and didn't say how much it had set aside for possible litigations in 2013.” (Wall Street Journal, “Société Générale and Crédit Agricole Under U.S. Investigation for Alleged Money Laundering, Sanction Breaches,” 3/7/14)

--

“The broader banking sanctions still in place [under the interim deal] are creating some ambiguities. The senior banker said Iranian authorities told businessmen that seven European banks including Commerzbank and Société Générale had been designated to transfer the $4.2bn in blocked funds but 'some kind of dilemma' remained over which Iranian banks could receive the money as most are affected by the broader banking sanctions still in place.” (Financial Times, “Easing of sanctions raises hopes for Iranian economy,” 1/19/14)

--

“A delegation of some of France's biggest companies will visit Iran next month to seek business as relations thaw with western powers, the head of the employers' union said on Wednesday…The prospect of an easing of trade restrictions has whetted the appetite of French firms eager to win back business in a country where some used to have extensive operations. The French Medef bosses' association has organized the visit for February 2-5, its president Pierre Gattaz told a news conference, confirming a report about the trip in the Wall Street Journal…Former French ambassador to Iran Francois Nicoullaud told Reuters that French firms that operated in Iran before the sanctions wanted to return. He cited Renault, PSA Peugeot Citroen, Airbus Group , Credit Agricole, Societe Generale and BNP Paribas.” (Reuters, “French trade delegation to visit Iran next month,” 1/15/14)

--

"Societe Generale SA, France's second-largest bank by market value, is cooperating with U.S. authorities looking into dollar transfers for clients in countries targeted by American economic sanctions. 'Societe Generale has started discussions with the Office of Foreign Assets Control,' the Paris-based bank said in its annual report today, without naming the clients or countries involved. The bank said it has begun an internal audit." (Bloomberg, "SocGen Cooperating With U.S. Authorities on Dollar Transfers, 3/7/13)

--

"Top-tier financial institutions including Societe Generale SA GLE.FR -0.74% and Rabobank Group have stepped back from business with Iran in recent months, citing increased political risk and logistical hassles that attend even legal trade with the country... In response, Rabobank and Société Générale say they have stopped servicing Iran deals or curbed their trade finance." (The Wall Street Journal, "Willing Banks Find Profits in Legal Trade With Iran," 4/8/2012)

--

"Present in Iran since 1974, our rep office in Tehran is primarily active in trade and export finance." (Company website)

--

"Societe Generale has done business in Iran since 1974. Spokesman Jim Galvin said the office in Tehran continues to be active in trade and export finance." From 2000-2009, the company was a recipient of $1.4 million US federal funds.  They currently have active business investments in Iran.  (The New York Times, "Profiting from Iran, and the US," 3/6/2010)

--

"The major French banks -- BNP Paribas, Calyon and Societe Generale -- have all stopped doing business with Tehran , while Total has frozen plans to invest in gas and LNG at the urging of its government." (Energy Compass, "Iran: Charm Mission," May 16, 2008)

--

"GIANTS WITH A FOOT IN TEHRAN: Total, Shell, Statoil, BNP Paribas, Commerzbank, MTN, UPS, Linde, Technip, Nokia, Ericsson, Peugeot, Renault, OMV, Societe Generale, ENI, Mitsubishi, Sumitomo, Siemens, LG, Samsung, Bosch, Valeo, Nestle, Unilever, BAT, Japan Tobacco." (The London Times, "American pressure threatens UK firms", May 27, 2006)

Response

No response at this time.

Schneider Electric

Industry
Energy
Value of USG Contracts
457
Value of USG Contract Source
http://usaspending.gov/explore?fromfiscal=yes&fiscal_year=2009&contractorid=246428&fiscal_year=&tab=By+Prime+Awardee&fromfiscal=yes&carryfilters=on&Submit=Go%20http://usaspending.gov/search?query=&searchtype=&formFields=eyJSZWNpcGllbnROYW1lTGNhc2UiOlsiU2NobmVpZGVyK0VsZWN0cmljK1NwYSJdfQ==
Symbol
EPA:SU
States
IL
Country
France
Contact Information
Sources

Iranian oil, gas, petrochemical and power industries services company Petrokalooj cites Schneider Electric as a supplier on its website.

--

"The company has been identified as potentially having business operations in Iran. In 2019 CalPERS designated the company as under review. In 2020 CalPERS changed the designation to “being monitored” because CalPERS’ initial screening has not identified the company as having involvement in the regions and/or activities targeted by the Act. CalPERS continues to monitor the company for possible changes in status relevant to the Act."

--

On June 1, 2020, the Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund identified Schneider Electric on its scrutinized companies Iran/Sudan list

--

In 2019, the California State Public Employees Retirement System (“CalPERS”), identified Schneider Electric as potentially having business operations in Iran and began the review process to determine whether Schneider Electric meets the threshold criteria for consideration under the [2019 California Public Divest from Iran] Act.  CalSTRS and CalPERS are the top two largest public pension funds in the United States with more than $550 billion in total assets under management combined.  

--

"Schneider Electric, an energy management specialist, has done business in Iran since the 1970s and continues to have an office there, according to its Web site." From 2000-2009, the company was a recipient of $348.8 million US federal funds.  Their investments in Iran are currently active.  (The New York Times "Profiting from Iran, and the US," 3/6/2010)

Response

“For your information, we have also been in contact with [CALPRS] in late 2019 and 2020 on the same matter.…We have ceased all in-country operations in Iran. Going forward our non-US subsidiaries only work with private partners outside Iran…As pointed out in your letter, there is no reference to Iran on our website… We are taking the necessary remedial actions to have the website taken down and on June 1, 2020 filed a formal complaint with the WIPO.” (6/19/2020)

Schlumberger

Industry
Energy
Value of USG Contracts
31
Value of USG Contract Source
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/03/06/world/iran-sanctions.html
Symbol
NYSE:SLB
States
CA
CO
FL
TX
Country
Netherlands
Sources

According to its Quarterly Report filed with the SEC for the quarterly period that ended March 31, 2020: "In 2013, Schlumberger completed the wind down of its service operations in Iran. Prior to this, certain non-US subsidiaries provided oilfield services to the National Iranian Oil Company and certain of its affiliates (“NIOC”).

Schlumberger’s residual transactions or dealings with the government of Iran during the first quarter of 2020 consisted of payments of taxes and other typical governmental charges. Certain non-US subsidiaries of Schlumberger maintain depository accounts at the Dubai branch of Bank Saderat Iran (“Saderat”), and at Bank Tejarat (“Tejarat”) in Tehran and in Kish for the deposit by NIOC of amounts owed to non-US subsidiaries of Schlumberger for prior services rendered in Iran and for the maintenance of such amounts previously received. One non-US subsidiary also maintained an account at Tejarat for payment of local expenses such as taxes. Schlumberger anticipates that it will discontinue dealings with Saderat and Tejarat following the receipt of all amounts owed to Schlumberger for prior services rendered in Iran."

--

As stated in its 2017 SEC 10-K: "Schlumberger’s residual transactions or dealings with the government of Iran during 2017 consisted of payments of taxes and other typical governmental charges. Certain non-US subsidiaries of Schlumberger maintain depository accounts at the Dubai branch of Bank Saderat Iran (“Saderat”), and at Bank Tejarat (“Tejarat”) in Tehran and in Kish for the deposit by NIOC of amounts owed to non-US subsidiaries of Schlumberger for prior services rendered in Iran and for the maintenance of such amounts previously received. One non-US subsidiary also maintained an account at Tejarat for payment of local expenses such as taxes. Schlumberger anticipates that it will discontinue dealings with Saderat and Tejarat following the receipt of all amounts owed to Schlumberger for prior services rendered in Iran.

During the fourth quarter of 2016, a non-US subsidiary entered into a memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) with NIOC relating to the non-disclosure of data required for the technical evaluation of an oilfield project.  In the first quarter of 2017, the Schlumberger subsidiary provided NIOC with written notice that it was terminating the MOU, effective March 11, 2017. The MOU did not involve the provision of services.  During the second quarter of 2017, and in furtherance of the termination of the MOU, the Schlumberger subsidiary had residual dealings with the NIOC consisting solely of the return of client data."  

--

In 2017 the U.S. state of Michigan listed Schlumberger on its Iran restricted investment list rendering Schlumberger in eligible for investment and/or state contracting.

 

--

On January 3, 2017, the National Iranian Oil Company (“NIOC”) listed Schlumberger as one of the “designated 29 non-Iranian companies [ ] qualified to participate in its pending tender round for upstream projects.”  (Oil & Gas Journal Website, “NIOC qualifies 29 firms for tender round,” 1/3/2017).  

--

Schlumberger reportedly signed a memorandum of understanding in November 2016 with a NIOC subsidiary, National Iranian South Oil Company, “over the development of several southern oil fields.” (Mehr News Agency, “Schlumberger enters Iran again,” 12/26/2016).

--

"Schlumberger Ltd., the world’s largest oil driller by market value, said Sunday it had signed a preliminary deal to study an Iranian oil field, as Donald Trump’s presidential victory has yet to deter U.S.-connected companies from dealing with Tehran. The contract is one of the most prominent signed since the Nov. 8 election. Mr. Trump has vowed to undo a nuclear pact with Tehran signed last year by global powers. The pledge has led many international companies to freeze their plans to enter the Islamic Republic despite the country’s huge potential as an energy and consumer market. But a spokesman for Schlumberger, one of the world’s largest oil-services companies, told The Wall Street Journal it has signed a memorandum of understanding with the state-run National Iranian Oil Company “for the non-disclosure of data required for a technical evaluation of a field development prospect.” Though it is incorporated in Curaçao in the Dutch Antilles, Schlumberger has one of its headquarters in Houston, while some of its shares trade in New York. If completed, the deal would be the first in Iran for Schlumberger since European sanctions for the company to leave the country in 2010." (Wall Street Journal, "Schlumberger Signs Early Oil Deal With Iran," 11/28/2016).

--

"Schlumberger NV, the world's No.1 oilfield services provider, said it would look at returning to Iran once the sanctions are lifted. 'When the sanctions are lifted and when it is permissible, we will evaluate going back in,' Chief Executive Paal Kibsgaard said on a post-earnings call." (Ahram Online, "Schlumberger says Evaluating Iran Return After Sanctions End," 7/17/15)

--

"The U.S. Justice Department said on Wednesday that a subsidiary of Schlumberger Oilfield Holdings had pleaded guilty to violating U.S. sanctions related to Iran and Sudan and would pay a $237.2 million fine. The oil well manufacturing company also agreed to a three-year period of corporate probation, during which it will cease all operations in Iran and Syria and hire an independent consultant to review its policies on complying with sanctions. 'For years, in a variety of ways, this foreign company facilitated trade with Iran and Sudan from Sugar Land, Texas,' U.S. Attorney Ronald C. Machen, Jr. said. 'Today's announcement should send a clear message to all global companies with a U.S. presence: Whether your employees are from the U.S. or abroad, when they are in the United States, they will abide by our laws or you will be held accountable,' Machen warned. In a statement, Schlumberger said it voluntarily ceased oilfield operation in Iran as of the second quarter of 2013 and said it has ceased oilfield operations in Sudan as of the plea agreement." (Reuters, "REFILE-UPDATE 3-Schlumberger Pleads Guilty to Violating U.S. sanctions on Iran, Sudan" 3/25/2015)

--

"Oil field services giant Schlumberger Ltd. said in a securities filing that it wound down its operations in Iran, which ran at a loss. The disclosure, made late Wednesday in a securities filing under sanctions law requirements that went into effect in February, said non-U.S. subsidiaries of Schlumberger provided oilfield services to the National Iranian Oil Co. in the first half of the year as the company completed its wind-down of the operations during the second quarter. Schlumberger earned $102 million in revenue during 2013 for the Iranian activity, resulting in a net loss of $69 million, it said in the filing. The company, which is the world’s largest oil field services firm, reported quarterly revenue of $11.2 billion, up more than 8% from the same period in 2012." (The Wall Street Journal, "Schlumberger Discloses Iran Operations Wind-Down, 7/25/2013")

--

"Khazar has also been working with Schlumberger, one of the last Western oilfield services firms currently operating in Iran. However, in January, Schlumberger, which has principal offices in Houston, Paris, and the Hague, announced that it will exit the country by the end of this year, after having booked USD 418m in revenue in 2012 through oilfield services provided by 'certain non-US subsidiaries' to the NIOC. 'Schlumberger intends to discontinue such activity in Iran in 2013 and is currently winding down its operations there,' the company stated in its annual report, adding that Schlumberger will leave once its ongoing contracts in the country expire." (Financial Times, "Iran seeks Chinese proxies to further offshore drilling ambitions," 5/31/2013) 

--

"The world's largest oil-services company has quietly promised the US State Department that it will pull out of Iran when its current contracts are complete, a spokesman for Schlumberger Ltd. has confirmed, marking what could be a major victory in the US struggle to cut off Iran's access to funds for its nuclear program. 'If it is true, it's huge,' said Richard Modesette, a former Commerce Department special agent. But internal company documents obtained by The Boston Globe show that Schlumberger - which is under investigation for possible sanctions violations - has signed contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars that it intends to complete before it exits. Those contracts will keep the company, believed to be the last Western oil-services firm in Iran, working in the oil-rich country until least 2013, a delay that has angered some US officials....But if Iran agrees to curb its nuclear program, sanctions could ease by the time Schlumberger’s last contract expires....In that case, the firm could just keep on doing business." (Boston Globe, "Oil firm says it will withdraw from Iran," 11/12/10)

--

"The oil exploration giant has long been active in Iran and continues to provide drilling and exploration services to Iran's oil and gas sector, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. "We work in more than 80 countries around the world, including Iran, and we abide by the rules in those countries," said a company spokesman, Stephen Whittaker, adding: "We don't take a position on what the country does or doesn't do. It is what it is."" 

From 2000-2009, the company was a recipient of $30.7 million US federal funds.  Their investments in Iran are currently active, however there are no plans for new investments.  (The New York Times, "Profiting from Iran, and the US." 3/6/2010)

--

Schulmberger lists a regional "Iran GeoMarket" headquarters office in Tehran (Company website, 7/13/09)

--

"But the device - developed by the oil-services firm Schlumberger in labs in Connecticut and Texas - was brought to Iran through a legal loophole that allows multinational corporations to use foreign subsidiaries to sidestep US sanctions, according to a Globe investigation. Schlumberger acknowledges that its US-developed tool has been used in Iran, and a spokesman said the company followed all applicable laws and regulations." (The Boston Globe, "Oil firm sidesteps sanctions on Iran," 12/7/08)

--

"In the early 1940 s, Texaco paid for its own dealings with hostile regimes such as Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan. And there are similarities with Schlumbergers business in Sudan, Iran and Venezuela, Rewcastle says. Schlumberger is the only major E&P company left in Iran and Sudan, he says. But its operations are well-diversified throughout the world. Its business sprawls over regions where drilling demand is surging, Gengaro says." (Investors Business Daily, "Schlumberger Makes Itself The Go-To Oil Services Firm," 8/1/07)

--

Listed by U.S. Government as doing business in Iran. (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, List of Companies Doing Business With State Sponsors Of Terror, Removed from the internet in July of 2007)

Response

No response at this time.

Samsung Group

Industry
Conglomerate
Value of USG Contracts
476
Value of USG Contract Source
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/03/06/world/iran-sanctions.html
Symbol
LSE:SMSN
Country
South Korea
Sources

The Samsung logo appears on the website of the Iranian IT security and surveillance firm, Hoortash Ryan Aflak (“Hoortash” a.k.a. “Hortash”).

--

"Tehran threatened to ban entry of Samsung Electronics employees and registration of mobile phones in Samsung label in protest to the Korean company’s decision to restrict Iranian access to its smartphone service.The list of measures against Samsung is ready,” said Mohammad Jafar Na’nakar, head of the legal department at the Ministry of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) in Iran, reported Iran’s state-run Press TV on Tuesday (local time).

The announcement came after the news that Samsung Electronics decided to stop the service of its Galaxy Store app in Iran." (Pulse, "Iran warns of punitive actions on Samsung Elec for its phone service restriction," 2/19/2020).

--

On Friday, referring to the two Korean giants Samsung and LG that have left the Iranian market under the pressure of the U.S. sanctions, Iran's Foreign Ministry Spokesman said it would be much more difficult to return later for those who were "strong-armed by the United States to leave". Iran was a key market for the products of the two South Korean companies including TV and audio sets, home appliances, air conditioners and mobile phones....Both companies assembled some of their products in Iran but cut down on providing products and parts to Iran and have now completely stopped. In his tweet on Friday which came with a photo of workers pulling down a Samsung banner, Mousavi said that Iranians will "not forget friends who stand by their side at times of hardship". The two companies which stopped selling to Iran two years ago under the pressure of sanctions had not stopped their advertising in Iran. 

Samsung, like most other leading brands, stopped directly selling smartphones to Iran when the sanctions began. Samsung was officially represented in Iran and used to run after-sales service centers in major cities.

However, illegally imported smartphones of various brands such as Samsung and Apple are still quite abundant in the market." (Radio Farda, "Iran Warns Korean Giants Forced By Sanctions Not To Leave Market," 2/15/2020).

"

--

"Among Asian businesses rethinking their dealings with Iran are banks, oil companies and technology giants including Huawei Technologies Co., Lenovo Group, LG Electronics Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. South Korean consumer-electronics giants Samsung and LG already have reduced exposure to Iran and are consulting with government officials in Seoul to determine whether they must withdraw from the nation entirely following the end of U.S. oil waivers, according to business people in Tehran who work with the companies. Iran had been financing purchases from both companies with funds generated from the sale of oil and crude-based products." (Wall Street Journal, "Asian Companies Pull Back From Iran Amid U.S. Pressure," 4/24/2019).

--

"Pyeongchang Olympic organizers said they had apologized to Iran on Friday after a diplomatic furor over its athletes being denied special Samsung phones issued for the Games. The head of the Pyeongchang organizing committee, Lee Hee-beom, confirmed he had written to the Iranian team “to apologize for the misunderstanding." The committee had initially claimed the phones were denied “because of existing UN sanctions,” even though all UN sanctions on Iran were lifted in 2015 apart from those linked to arms and nuclear technology. Samsung billboards and flagship stores are seen all over Iran, and the South Korean company has sponsored many large-scale cultural events, including the current exhibition at the Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art." (February 10, 2018). 

--

"South Korea's tech giant Samsung - that has just finished a major oil project in Iran - says it is determined to continue working in the Iranian oil industry. Sun Lee, a top Samsung official in Iran, has told reporters that his company hopes to win new projects in that sector. He also said the company will continue offering maintenance and spare parts supply services for a mega floating oil export terminal for Iran that it finished on 8 February. Sun emphasized that the construction of the terminal - dubbed Persian Gulf - was made possible through overcoming severe financial problems, the Persian-language newspaper Forsat-e Emrooz reported. He said the high quality of the terminal is proportionate to Iran's crude export conditions, adding that this terminal will play an important role in Iran's oil industry. The Persian Gulf terminal - that has been described as the world's largest - has a total capacity of 2.2 million barrels and can store some 200,000 barrels per day of heavy crude oil produced in Iran's offshore oil fields of Soroush and Nowruz. South Korea's Samsung started building the terminal in 2008 and finished it on 8 February 2015 at a cost of about $300 million." (Press TV, "Samsung wants more Iran oil projects," 2/9/15)

--

"Iran is in talks with three Japanese and South Korean oil and gas companies to invest in its oil and gas projects, Head of Investment Committee of the National Iranian Gas Company (NIGC) Asghar Soheilipour said. He said that Japan's Mitsubishi and South Korea's LG and Samsung are negotiating with NIGC to design, establish, and install gas refineries and pipelines, Iran's Mehr news agency reported on Jan. 13. Some Japanese and Italian companies have announced readiness to implement projects even before lifting the international sanctions, he noted." (Trend, "Iran in Talks with Japanese, Korean Oil and Gas Companies," 1/13/15)

--

"Head of the investment committee of the Iran National Gas Company (INGC) Asghar Soheilipour said that his company was offering information about Iran's top priority gas projects to potential foreign and domestic investors... The official referred to Mitsubishi, LG and Samsung as corporations having announced readiness for making investments in Iran gas projects." (IRNA, "Official: Foreign firms eying investment in Iran gas industry," 1/3/15)

--

“Iranian telecommunications minister Mahmoud Vaezi has criticized Samsung for cutting the access to Samsung's mobile app store for Iranian users, ISNA reported on March 16. Mahmoud Vaezi said Samsung should resolve the problem as soon as possible. Representative of Samsung in Iran has pledged to resume the service as of April 6, 2014, Vaezi added. Iranian device users lost access to Samsung's mobile app store as of May 22, 2013. The Korean electronics giant said that it couldn't provide access to the store because of 'legal barriers'. Many sanctions have been imposed on Iran over its nuclear program, and Samsung's step is viewed as the latest such measure. Unlike Apple, Microsoft and Adobe, Samsung provided localized services to Iranians in Persian language. It also isn't the first handset vendor to pull back from Iran. Nokia stopped its services in the country last year. On June 9, 2013, the Tasnim News Agency quoted Tehran Chamber of Commerce member Mohammad-Hossein Barkhordar as saying that Samsung will lift ban on Iranian users to access app store sooner or later. Samsung took the decision in order to show off in the international arena, but it retreated from the decision and found out that it was wrong, Barkhordar said.” (Trend, “Iranian telecom minister criticizes Samsung,” 3/16/14)

--

"But its population of about 75 million includes a sizeable urban middle class who have been avid consumers of foreign-made goods, including Samsung and Sony electronics and Peugeot cars." (Reuters, "Iran says it will cut imports of non-essential goods," 10/15/2012)

--

"After being hit by European and U.S. sanctions, Iran's oil sales are stabilizing as the country entices buyers with attractive prices and a form of barter. But proposed new U.S. restrictions could further bite into its crude exports later this year . . . A form of barter set up by Iran provides an incentive to keep—or in the case of Seoul, to resume—its crude purchases. Faced with banking sanctions that impede its ability to receive crude proceeds and settle its bills for imported goods, the Islamic Republic increasingly gets paid into accounts based in the Asian countries where it sells the oil and in their local currency. Iranian traders then draw on the reserves to purchase goods exported to Iran. South Korean products are ubiquitous in Tehran—from smartphones made by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. to LG Electronics Inc. televisions and even costume dramas on local televisions; Iranian imports from the country amounted to $6 billion last year." (Wall Street Journal, "Iran Barters and Bargains to Help Oil Sales," 8/7/12)

--

"South Korea has imposed curbs on exports to Iran - mainly steel, cars and electronics - to reduce its risk of payment defaults as western sanctions disrupt Iranian oil exports, highlighting the growing risk of doing business with the Islamic Republic. The move to limit the trade exposure of Asia's fourth-largest economy, which sold $1.7 billion of goods in Iran in the first quarter of this year, was announced by South Korea's leading trade and business body and came into effect this week…Export quotas could be imposed on products including Samsung Electronics' mobile phones and Hyundai Motor's vehicles, a source has told Reuters."  (Reuters, "South Korea limits Iran exports on payment concerns," 6/14/12)

--

"Export quotas could be imposed on products including Samsung Electronics' mobile phones and Hyundai Motor's vehicles, one of the sources said... Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics accounted for a combined 30 percent of Iran's mobile phone market, Korean major newspaper Dong-a Ilbo reported in January." (Reuters, "South Korea may limit exports to Iran on payment concerns: sources," 5/17/2012)

--

"Samsung, an electronics giant, markets its products in Iran, according to its website."  From 2000-2009, the company received $476.4 million US federal funds.  Their activities in Iran are currently active.  (The New York Times, "Profiting from Iran, and the US," 3/6/2010)

--

"Nestle has been the target of protests by Islamists since the Gaza onslaught began, some Iranian websites said. It is among a small number of foreign companies which have factories in Iran, which notably also includes French automaker Renault. Others, such as South Korean group Samsung, market their products in the Islamic republic. Some, particularly in the oil and gas sector, have operated in the country for some time, such as Frances Total and Anglo-Dutch Shell." (Agence France Presse, "Iran to punish firms trading with Israel," 1/12/09)

--

"GIANTS WITH A FOOT IN TEHRAN: Total, Shell, Statoil, BNP Paribas, Commerzbank, MTN, UPS, Linde, Technip, Nokia, Ericsson, Peugeot, Renault, OMV, Societe Generale, ENI, Mitsubishi, Sumitomo, Siemens, LG, Samsung, Bosch, Valeo, Nestle, Unilever, BAT, Japan Tobacco." (The London Times, "American pressure threatens UK firms," 5/27/06)

Response

No response at this time.

Reliance Industries

Industry
Energy
Value of USG Contracts
900
Value of USG Contract Source
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/03/06/world/iran-sanctions.html
Symbol
BSE: 500325
States
TX
Country
India
Contact Information
Sources

"The company was reported as potentially purchasing Iranian crude. In 2018 CalPERS designated the company as under review. In 2019 CalPERS changed the designation to “being monitored” because CalPERS’ initial screening has not identified the company as having involvement in the regions and/or activities targeted by the Act. CalPERS has maintained the company in “monitor” status for 2020. CalPERS continues to monitor the company for possible changes in status relevant to the Act."

--

"Reliance Industries Ltd. has reportedly started purchasing Iranian crude after a six-year hiatus. Reliance Industries Ltd. had previously been removed from the Iran-related securities list. In 2017, CalSTRS designated Reliance Industries Ltd. as “Under Review” for potentially having new ties to Iran. In 2018, CalSTRS designated Reliance Industries as “Being Monitored.” While the company has announced they plan to halt purchases of Iranian crude, India was one of eight countries receiving a sanction waiver that has since expired. CalSTRS has maintained the “Being Monitored” status in 2020 while confirming the company's compliance with current sanctions."

--

Reliance Industries Ltd. had previously been removed from the Iran-related securities list. In 2017, CalSTRS designated Reliance Industries Ltd. as “Under Review” for potentially having new ties to Iran. In 2018, CalSTRS designated Reliance Industries as “Being Monitored”. While the company has announced they plan to halt purchases of Iranian crude, India was one of eight countries receiving a sanction waiver. CalSTRS maintained the "being monitored" designation in 2019

--

In 2018 CalPERS designated the company as under review. In 2019 CalPERS changed the designation to “being monitored” because CalPERS’ initial screening has not identified the company as having involvement in the activities targeted by the Act. CalPERS will continue to assess and/or monitor the company for possible changes in status relevant to the Act.

--

"India’s Reliance Industries Ltd, owner of the world’s biggest refining complex, is planning to halt oil imports from Iran, two sources familiar with the matter said, in a first sign that new U.S. sanctions are forcing buyers to shun oil purchases from Tehran." (5/30/2018)

--

In 2017 the U.S. state of California listed Reliance Industries Ltd as a company under review for reportedly started purchasing Iranian crude after a six-year hiatus. 

--

"For the year, the world's third biggest oil consumer bought about 473,000 barrels per day (bpd) of oil from Iran to feed expanding refining capacity, up from 208,300 bpd in 2015, the data showed... Indian refiners Reliance Industries, Hindustan Petroleum, Bharat Petroleum and HPCL-Mittal Energy Ltd (HMEL) last year resumed imports from Tehran, attracted by the discount offered by Iran." (Reuters, "India's 2016 Iran Oil Imports Hit Record High - Trade," 1/13/2017).

--

“India's purchases of Iranian oil fell 4.1 percent in September, slipping from August when imports from Tehran hit their highest in at least 15 years, according to ship tracking data and a report compiled by Thomson Reuters Oil Research and Forecasts... and 69,000 bpd imported by Reliance Industries Ltd…”(Reuters, "India's Sept Iran oil imports fall 4.1 percent on Aug - shipping data," 10/12/2016).

--

"Open sources reported that Reliance Industries of India sold gasoline to Iran in 2009, but subsequently stopped in 2010." (U.S. Government Accountability Office, Report: "Firms Reported in Open Sources to Have Sold Iran Refined Petroleum Products between January 1, 2009 and June," September 3, 2010)

--

"Reliance was one of the Iran's main suppliers of gasoline, but it stopped shipping to Iran in the spring of 2009, after members of Congress called for an investigation into loan guarantees provided by the United States Export-Import Bank to help Reliance expand a facility where it was refinancing petroleum for sale to Iran. Some Reliance gasoline has made it to Iran since, however, through third parties the company does not control."  From 2000-2009, the company was the recipient of $900 million US federal funds.  They have withdrawn their business from Iran. (The New York Times, "Profiting from Iran, and the US," 3/6/2010)

--

"Due to limited refining capabilities, Iran imports approximately 40% of its domestic gasoline consumption. Iran is the second-largest importer of gasoline in the world. That gasoline is supplied primarily by five companies: the Swiss-Dutch energy trading giants Vitol and Trafigura, the Indian multinational Reliance Industries, the Swiss trader Glencore and the French energy firm Total." (The Wall Street Journal, "Hitting Tehran Where It Hurts," 7/13/09)

--

"Because of a lack of domestic refining capacity, oil-rich Iran is dependent on gasoline imports to meet about 40 percent of domestic consumption. Iran gets most of its gasoline imports from the Swiss firm Vitol, the Swiss/Dutch firm Trafigura, France's Total, the Swiss firm Glencore and British Petroleum, as well as the Indian firm Reliance." (Agence-France Press, "US lawmakers target Iran gasoline imports," 6/23/09)

--

"Members of Congress seeking to block U.S. support to an Indian company that provides gasoline to Iran have apparently scored a partial victory. The company, Reliance Industries Limited, plans to cease all future gas sales to Iran, according to an article in Indias Business Standard newspaper." (Congressional Quarterly Today, "Targeted Indian Gasoline Supplier Reportedly Will Halt Deliveries to Iran," 01/07/09)

--

"In recent months, Iran has, according to the respected trade publication International Oil Daily and other sources including the U.S. government, purchased nearly all of this gasoline from just five companies, four of them European: the Swiss firm Vitol; the Swiss/Dutch firm Trafigura; the French firm Total; British Petroleum; and one Indian company, Reliance Industries." (The Wall Street Journal, "How To Put The Squeeze On Iran," 11/13/08)

--

"India's Reliance Industries, widely believed to have stopped fuel sales to Iran, exported three cargoes to Tehran in January, trade sources said on Tuesday." (Reuters, "India's Reliance sent cargoes to Iran in Jan-sources," 02/03/09)

Response

No response at this time.

PepsiCo

Industry
Food and Beverage
Value of USG Contracts
25
Value of USG Contract Source
http://usaspending.gov/explore?fromfiscal=yes&fiscal_year=2007&contractorid=882&fiscal_year=&tab=By+Prime+Awardee&fromfiscal=yes&carryfilters=on&Submit=Go%20http://usaspending.gov/explore?fromfiscal=yes&fiscal_year=2007&contractorid=10839&fiscal_year=&tab=By+Prime+Awardee&fromfiscal=yes&carryfilters=on&Submit=Go
Symbol
NYSE:PEP
States
IL
NY
TX
Country
USA
Contact Information
Sources

According to its Annual Report filed with the SEC for fiscal year 2015: "The Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (ITRA) requires disclosure of certain activities relating to Iran by PepsiCo or its affiliates that occurred during our 2015 fiscal year. As previously disclosed, one of our foreign subsidiaries historically maintained a small office in Iran, which provided sales support to independent bottlers in Iran in connection with in-country sales of foreign-owned beverage brands, and which was not in contravention of any applicable U.S. sanctions laws. The office ceased all commercial activity since the enactment of ITRA. During our 2015 fiscal year, our foreign subsidiary received a license from the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control authorizing it to engage in activities related to the winding down of the office in Iran and completed the process of winding down its office. The foreign subsidiary did not engage in any activities in Iran other than wind-down activities in 2015, or have any revenues or profits attributable to activities in Iran during 2015."

--

According to its Annual Report filed with the SEC for fiscal year 2014: "The Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (ITRA) requires disclosure of certain activities relating to Iran by PepsiCo or its affiliates that occurred during our 2014 fiscal year. As previously disclosed, one of our foreign subsidiaries historically maintained a small office in Iran, which provided sales support to independent bottlers in Iran in connection with in-country sales of foreign-owned beverage brands, and which was not in contravention of any applicable U.S. sanctions laws. The office ceased all commercial activity since the enactment of ITRA. In addition, the office of the foreign subsidiary had one local bank account, containing aggregate deposits of approximately $180, with a bank identified on the list of “Specially Designated Nationals” maintained by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). During our 2014 fiscal year, our foreign subsidiary received a license from OFAC authorizing it to engage in activities related to the winding down of the office in Iran and to close the bank account. Following receipt of this license, our foreign subsidiary restarted the process of winding down its office and closed the bank account. Subsequent to the end of 2014, this license expired and the foreign subsidiary ceased the process of winding down its office upon expiration of the license. The foreign subsidiary has applied for a license from OFAC to authorize continuation and completion of wind-down activities and intends to continue such activities upon receipt thereof. The foreign subsidiary did not engage in any activities in Iran other than wind-down activities in 2014, or have any revenues or profits attributable to activities in Iran during 2014."
--

According to its Annual report filed with the SEC for fiscal year 2013: "The Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (ITRA) requires disclosure of certain activities relating to Iran by PepsiCo or its affiliates that occurred during our 2013 fiscal year.  As previously disclosed, one of our foreign subsidiaries historically maintained a small office in Iran, which provided sales support to independent bottlers in Iran in connection with in-country sales of foreign-owned beverage brands, and which was not in contravention of any applicable U.S. sanctions laws. In 2012, our foreign subsidiary took steps to close its office in Iran, including terminating all three of its employees, and the office has ceased all commercial activity since the enactment of ITRA.  During 2013, our foreign subsidiary continued the process of winding down its office in Iran pursuant to a general license from the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) until the expiration of such license in March 2013. The subsidiary did not engage in any activities in Iran other than wind-down activities in 2013, or have any revenues or profits attributable to activities in Iran during 2013. The office of the subsidiary continues to have one local bank account, containing aggregate deposits of approximately $180, with a bank identified on the list of “Specially Designated Nationals” maintained by OFAC. The subsidiary has applied for a license from OFAC to authorize continuation and completion of wind-down, including closing the bank account, and plans to resume and complete such wind-down activities upon receipt thereof."

--

According to its Annual Report filed with the SEC for fiscal year 2012: "The recently enacted Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (TRA) requires disclosure of certain activities relating to Iran by PepsiCo or its affiliates that occurred during the twelve month period covered by this report. One of our foreign subsidiaries had historically maintained a small office in Iran, which provided sales support to independent bottlers in Iran in connection with in-country sales of foreign-owned beverage brands, and which was not in contravention of any applicable U.S. sanctions laws. Starting in early 2012, our foreign subsidiary began to take steps to close this office in Iran, including the termination of all three of its employees, and the office has ceased all commercial activity since enactment of the TRA. Prior to the enactment of the TRA, this foreign subsidiary paid local Iranian governmental authorities taxes associated with the office and with wind-down activities. The office also maintained local bank accounts with two banks identified on the list of “Specially Designated Nationals” (SDN) maintained by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). The aggregate amount of transactions or dealings the business office had with the Iranian Government and banks on the SDN list in 2012 was approximately $100,000, and no gross revenue or net profit was attributable to such activity. Our foreign subsidiary is currently in the process of completing the wind-down of the office in Iran pursuant to a general license from OFAC and intends to seek any further specific licenses as may be necessary in order to complete the wind-down of this office."

--

Over the last three presidential administrations, the United States government has granted Pepsi 16 special licenses to do business in Iran. (New York Times, "Companies with Permission to Bypass Sanctions," 12/24/10)

--

"This license authorized Pepsi to sell its products in Iran. The company has also been licensed to sell its products in Sudan. A company spokesperson said that the company was abiding by United States law: 'When it comes to politically sensitive markets, we rely on rules set by the U.S. Government, and we're committed to adhering to those rules, however they may evolve.'" (New York Times, "Licenses Granted to U.S. Companies Run the Gamut," 12/24/10)

--

An AP review of corporate SEC filings found dozens of companies that have done business in Iran in recent years or said their products or services may have made it there through other channels. Some are household names: PepsiCo, Tyson Foods, Canon, BP Amoco, Exxon Mobil, GE Healthcare, the Wells Fargo financial services company, Visa, MasterCard and the Cadbury Schweppes candy and beverage maker. (Associated Press, "From bull semen to bras, Iran still buys American," 7/9/08)

--

"The only visual clues that these lunching ladies aren't dining at some smart New York City eatery but in the heart of Washington's Axis of Evil are the expensive Hermès scarves covering their blond-tipped hair in deference to the mullahs. And the drink of choice? This being revolutionary Iran, where alcohol is banned, the women are making do with Coca-Cola. Coca-Cola? Isn't corporate America prohibited by Washington's sanctions from doing business in Iran? Yes, for the most part, says U.S. Treasury spokeswoman Molly Millerwise. But Treasury has bent the rules for foodstuffs, a loophole through which American drinks giants Coca-Cola (Charts) and PepsiCo (Charts) have been able to pour thousands of gallons of concentrate into Iran via Irish subsidiaries. And that has allowed these brands, so much a symbol of America - and so much an affront to Iran's conservative clerics - to open another front in their global cola war. After just a few years back in Iran, Coke and Pepsi have grabbed about half the national soft drink sales in what is one of the Middle East's biggest drinks market... Coke and Pepsi shrug off the hardliner rhetoric and insist they are aren't breaking any laws - American or Iranian - by licensing products in Iran through their concentrate subsidiaries in Ireland. Says Pepsi spokesman Dick Detwiler: 'PepsiCo has no equity investment in Sasan or any other enterprise in Iran and has no relationship with the government of Iran. We sell in strict accordance with all applicable U.S. laws and restrictions.' Coke spokesman Charles Sutlive echoes Pepsi's line, adding that Coke, which also licenses Fanta, Sprite and Dasani water through Khoshgovar, has 'no tangible assets in Iran'... But the fiercest battle is being fought in the marketplace, where Zamzam is defending its estimated 50 percent share of Iran's $1 billion in annual drinks sales, and Coke seems to have a clear edge over Pepsi. Shopkeeper Shahgholi owns a store in downtown Tehran around the corner from the former U.S. embassy, today a museum displaying 'U.S. atrocities' that draws few visitors. 'Nine of out ten bottles I sell are Coke,' he says. Sasan's Abadi says Pepsi and Coke share about 40 percent of the market, but Khoshgovar commercial manager Fahime Askari puts Coke's market share way ahead of Pepsi's. Reliable sales figures are hard to come by. Coke may be the real thing in Iran, but you won't hear that familiar slogan here. Washington's rules forbid U.S. companies to provide their licensees marketing support in Iran. It wouldn't be welcomed anyway by the mullahs, who regard America-themed advertising as spiritual pollution. 'Because of the relationship between Iran and America,' Abadi says, 'we are not allowed to advertise in public places.'" (Fortune, "Iran's cola war," 2/6/07)

--

"Both Pepsi and Coca-Cola have factories in Iran." (Agence France Presse, Iran TV urges boycott of Zionist products," 7/19/06)

--

"Both companies send the syrup to independent companies in Sudan and Iran, which then produce the drinks in their own factories, selling them in bottles and cans identical to Coca-Cola and Pepsi containers found elsewhere. A Coca-Cola spokesman, Dana Bolden, said the primary motive for operating in Sudan and Iran was 'to ensure quality control and protect our trademarks with the independent bottler.'" (The International Herald Tribune, "Coveted U.S. products find way past sanctions," 5/27/08)

--

“There's also an undercurrent of anti-Americanism that has shaped Germany's Iran policy. Ruprecht Polenz, the top Christian Democrat on the Bundestag's Foreign Affairs Committee, has defended German trade with Iran by evoking the presence of Coca Cola and Pepsi in Iran.” (The New Republic, "Business as Usual: How Europe Will Undermine Obama's Iran Policy," 8/17/08)

Response

No response at this time.