Attempted to ship computer goods through Germany to Iran.

2001 - 2003 Exportation of services to Iran.

Intensa had conducted business with an Italian firm, Irasco, that was found to be Iranian owned. The fine was particularly harsh because Intesa was found to have failed to maintain a sufficiently robust compliance program over the time the apparent violations took place.

Exported $2.3 million in parts for petrochemical products to oil companies owned on behalf of the Government of Iran.

Conspired to violate U.S. sanctions on Iran and Cuba by processing several thousand wire transfers, travelers' checks, and trade finance transactions involving Iran, Sudan, Cuba, Burma and Libya.

On or about June 2, 1998, ISC transferred the goods referred to in Charge 1 from the United States to the United Arab Emirates with knowledge that a violation of the Regulations would occur - that the goods which were subject to both the Regulations and the Iranian Transactions Regulations would be transferred to Iran.

Between November 2009 and February 2012, Kaiga, managing director of Industrial Metals and Commodities, used as an intermediary to export 7075 Aluminum tubing from a company in northern Illinois to Belgium, then to Malaysia on behalf of Saeed Valadbaigi of Iran.

New York authorities fined a South Korean bank over long-running gaps in its defenses against money laundering, after the lender’s Manhattan branch was used to launder cash for Iran.

Indam appears to have violated the ITSR between July 4, 2006, and October 23, 2008, when Indam attempted to export or exported nine shipments of goods, collectively valued at $27,846, from the United States to the United Arab Emirates, with reason to know that the shipments were intended specifically for supply, transshipment, or reexportation to two oil drilling rigs destined for or located in Iranian waters.

1995 - 1997 IEPS' provision of brokerage services to Iran and importation of financial services into the United States.