Technical Talking Points
Number of Centrifuges
As
of May 2011, Iran was in
possession of approximately 8,000 P1 centrifuges at the Natanz Fuel
Enrichment
Plant. 5,860 of these centrifuges are in operation in 35 cascades.
Additional
centrifuges are located in the advanced Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant,
which uses
two centrifuge cascades (328 centrifuges) to enrich 3.5 percent low
enriched
uranium (LEU) to almost 20 percent LEU.[1]
How much enriched uranium can
Iran produce per year?
As
of May 2011, the average
monthly rate of low-enriched uranium production is 156 kg per month of
LEU
hexafluoride (UF6).[2]
Based on this figure, Iran could potentially produce 1,872 kg of LEU
per year.
Approximately 1000 kgs of LEU is needed to construct a nuclear device.[3]
How much enriched uranium does
Iran currently possess?
As
of May 13, 2011, Iran has
produced 4,105 kilograms of LEU hexafluoride (UF6);
499 kg is
estimated to have been produced since February 5, 2010 alone.[4]
Iran currently has enough LEU to produce at least two nuclear bombs
after
further enrichment.[5]
In a breakout scenario,
Iran’s facilities could potentially convert low-enriched uranium to
weapons
grade within three to six months.[6]
At the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant, which is part of the Natanz
facility, Iran
has begun to further enrich its LEU stockpile to 20 percent purity,
bringing
the regime closer to weapons-grade level material. As of May 2011, Iran
has
produced 56.7 kg of 20 percent enriched uranium.[7]
What are Iran’s main nuclear
facilities?
Bushehr: The power plant at Bushehr was
originally built with
the help of Germany’s Kraftwerk Union (a subsidiary of Siemens AG) in
the
1970s. Work resumed in the late 1990s under Russia’s Atomstroyexport. The US opposed
the construction of Bushehr in 1998 for the following reasons: “First
was that weapons grade plutonium could be extracted from the reactor
allowing
the Iranians to construct nuclear weapons. Secondly, the US was
concerned that
the knowledge gained by Iranian scientists working at Bushehr could
further Iran’s
nuclear weapons program.”[8]
Though Iran claims Bushehr is for civilian purposes only, it is still a
cause
for concern. The spent fuel in Bushehr, a light water reactor, can be
reprocessed to HEU and used for weapons purposes.[9]
The plutonium produced by the fuel rods could also be used to create a
plutonium bomb. Iran began loading fuel into the Bushehr on October 26,
2010.[10]
The
February 2011 IAEA report also revealed that Bushehr is facing serious
technical setbacks and that the 163 fuel rods in reactor's core will
have to be
removed. It is unclear whether these difficulties arise from sabotage
or
startup problems.[11]
Arak: The heavy water production
facility at Arak was revealed to the public in 2002 by the National
Council of
Resistance in Iran, an opposition group against the regime. As of fall
2008,
satellite imagery showed that significant progress had been made on the
construction of the facility. The reactor at Arak is called the IR-40.
Construction may be completed by 2011, with the facility being fully
operational in 2013. Arak would produce approximately 9 kg of plutonium
a year
(enough for two nuclear bombs annually).[12]
Heavy-water
reactors use natural uranium as fuel in order to produce plutonium. Iran can therefore acquire
natural uranium
for non-weapons purposes (research, power production, etc) and use it
to
produce weapons-grade (“fissile” or “fissionable”) material. Even if
the United
Nations and International Atomic Energy Agency provided Iran with
uranium for
civil purposes under the provisions of the Non-Proliferation Treaty
(NPT), Iran
would be able to use the low-enriched uranium to create fissile
plutonium for a
nuclear weapon. Only
several kilograms
of weapons-grade plutonium is necessary for an implosion bomb, making
plutonium
extremely dangerous in the hands of rogue nations and terrorists.
Natanz: The
enrichment facility at Natanz was revealed to the public in 2002 by the
National Council of Resistance in Iran. Natanz enables Iran to produce
large
amounts of low-enriched uranium that can be enriched to weapons-grade
within a
short period of time. The facility has two components: a fuel
enrichment plant
(FEP) with two cascade halls, and a pilot fuel enrichment plant (PFEP)
with one
cascade hall comprised of six cascades. The PFEP is also broken into
two parts,
with one part designed to enrich LEU up to 20% U-235, and the other
designated
as an R&D area.
Esfahan: Esfahan
is believed to be the center of Iran’s nuclear weapons program and the
country’s largest nuclear research center. It is believed to have
housed
missile and chemical weapons programs throughout the 1980s and 1990s,
receiving
assistance from North Korea and China. Esfahan has a uranium conversion
facility (it received technology from China in the 1990s)—for
conversion to gas
prior to enrichment--and a Fuel Fabrication Laboratory (to produce fuel
for a
nuclear reactor), among others.[13]
Qom: In September 2009, it was
revealed during a meting of
the G-20 that Iran was constructing the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant
(FFEP) near
Qom. In violation
of the Nuclear Non
Proliferation Treaty Safeguard Agreement, Iran did not initially
declare the
facility to the IAEA. Iran has claimed that the plant is being
constructed as
“a contingency enrichment plant, so that enrichment activities shall
not be
suspended in the case of any military attack.”[14]
This facility is being built to contain sixteen cascades with
approximately
3,000 of Iran’s “third generation” centrifuges, which are built to spin
at
speeds far greater than its other centrifuges.
There is extensive evidence alleging that design and
construction of
FFEP began as early as 2006, but Iran has continually refused to answer
any
questions about the facility.[15]
Tehran: The Tehran Research Reactor is a
5 megawatt-thermal
light water research center that the United States supplied to Iran in
1967. In 1987 the
Atomic Energy
Organization of Iran (AEOI) paid Argentina to convert the reactor’s
fuel from
93% enriched uranium to 20% enriched uranium.
The reactor has been operating with the LEU fuel since
1993.[16]
What kind of nuclear-capable
missiles does Iran
possess?
Iran’s
missile program mainly
consists of the Shahab-1, Shahab-2, Shahab-3, Shahab-4 and Ghadr-1
Kavoshgar
(Shahab-3M) missiles. The Shahab variants are believed to have some of
the same
parts as North Korean SCUD missiles—missile-collusion between the two
countries
is highly apparent.[17] Plans for several other
Shahab variants are
rumored to be in existence. Reports suggest that Iran may also have
short-range
ballistic missiles like the Fateh A-110 and the Chinese-imported CSS-8
(Tondar-69).
Iran’s
Sajjil-2, tested in
2008 and operational in 2012, is a solid-fuel missile, “which means it
has a
short preparation time and can’t be as easily deterred by a pre-emptive
strike.” A 2010 report by the International Institute for Strategic
Studies
(IISS) found that “Iran is the only country to have developed a missile
of this
reach without first having developed nuclear weapons.”[18]
February
2010 cables released
by WikiLeaks in November 2010 revealed that North Korea had provided
Iran with
BM-25 missiles. This advanced missile is based on the Russian R-27,
which was
“once used by Soviet submarines to carry nuclear warheads.”[19]
How many missiles does Iran have?
Iran
is believed to possess
50-300 Shahab-1 missiles, 50-150 Shahab-2 missiles, 25-100 Shahab-3,
16-35
Shahab-4 missiles, 50-90 of the Sajjil variant, and 19 BM-25.[20]
Its official inventory is unknown.
What are the ranges of these
missiles?
The
Shahab-1, Shahab-2,
Shahab-3, and Shahab-4 missiles have ranges of 300 km, 500 km, 1,300
km, and
3218-4000 km, respectively. [21]
The other Shahab variants may have ranges of 1,500-2,500 km, making
them
capable of striking targets in the Middle East, Turkey, and
southeastern
Europe. The Shahab-3 and its higher-range variants are believed to be
adequate
delivery methods for nuclear warheads.[22]
The Sajjil-2 has a range of 1,400 miles, making it capable of reaching
parts of
Europe.[23]
The BM-25 missile, provided by North Korea, is believed to have a range
of
2,000 miles.
[1] “Implementation
of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security
Council
resolutions in the Islamic Republic of Iran.” IAEA
Director General. 24 May 2011.
[2] David Albright, Andrea Stricker, and
Christina Walrond, “IAEA
Iran Safeguards Report:
.” Institute
for Science and
International Security. 24
May 2011.
[3] David Albright and Jacqueline Shire, “IAEA
Report on Iran.” Institute for
Science and International Security. 19 February 2009.
[4] “Implementation
of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security
Council
resolutions in the Islamic Republic of Iran.” IAEA
Director General. 24 May 2011.
[5] Glenn Kessler, “IAEA
report confirms Iran temporarily shut down centrifuges,” The Washington Post. 23 November 2010.
[6] David Albright, Paul Brannan, and Jacqueline
Shire, “ISIS
Analysis of August 2009 IAEA Iran Report.” Institute
for Science and International Security. 28 August 2009.
[7] “Implementation
of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security
Council
resolutions in the Islamic Republic of Iran.” IAEA
Director General. 24 May 2011.
[9] US Energy Information Administration, “Introduction
to
Nuclear Power.”
[10] “Iran
loads fuel into the Bushehr nuclear reactor,” BBC. 26 October
2010.
[11] William
Broad and
David Sanger, “Iran
Reports a Major Setback at a Nuclear Power Plant.” The New York Times. 25 February 2011.
[12] David Albright and Paul Brannan, “Arak
Heavy Water Reactor Construction Progressing.” Institute
for Science and International Security.
13 November 2008.
[13] GlobalSecurity.org, “Esfahan
Nuclear
Technology Center.”
[14] Peter Crall, “IAEA
Rebukes Iran over
Secret Facility,” Arms Control Association. December 2009.
[15] “Implementation
of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran.” International Atomic
Energy Agency. May 2010.
[16] ISISNuclearIran.org, “Nuclear
Sites: Tehran
Nuclear Research Center.”
[17] “Iran’s
Nuclear and Missile
Potential: A Joint Threat Assessment by US and Russian Technical Experts.”
East West Institute. May 2009.
[18] “Iran
tests new surface-to-surface missile.” CNN. 20 May 2009.
[19] Duncan Gardham, “WikiLeaks:
Iran ‘obtains North Korea missiles which can strike Europe.’”
The Telegraph. 29 November 2010.
[20] GlobalSecurity.org. “Iran
Missiles.”
[21] Ibid.
[22] Andrew Feickert, “Iran’s
Ballistic
Missile Capabilities.” Congressional
Research Service. 23 August 2004.
[23] “Iran
tests new surface-to-surface missile.” CNN. 20 May 2009.
Search
Join us on